City University of New York Athletic Conference: usability rankings

Usability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 7 City University of New York Athletic Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 7
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the City University of New York Athletic Conference (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

D 65

Average usability score of 6 fully scanned City University of New York Athletic Conference member sites

17th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score

6 of 7

City university of new york athletic conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades

D 68

Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How City University of New York Athletic Conference usability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 6 fully scanned City University of New York Athletic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 6 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • City University of New York Athletic Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How City University of New York Athletic Conference usability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 391
40 to 490
50 to 591
60 to 691
70 to 790
80 to 893
90 to 1000

City University of New York Athletic Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. City University of New York Athletic Conference: 6 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. City University of New York Athletic ConferenceB to C (70 to 89): 50% (3 sites)D to F (below 70): 50% (3 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 11% (289 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 42% (1,124 sites)D to F (below 70): 47% (1,274 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
City University of New York Athletic Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
City University of New York Athletic Conference0% (0)50% (3)50% (3)
All education sites11% (289)42% (1,124)47% (1,274)

Top 3 City University of New York Athletic Conference member sites by usability score

#1 in City University of New York Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 4

CUNY Bernard M Baruch College

B 87 usability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability B
  • Security D
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

#2 in City University of New York Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 10

CUNY Hunter College

B 80 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

#2 in City University of New York Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 10

CUNY Medgar Evers College

B 80 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

Most common usability failures among City University of New York Athletic Conference member sites

Share of the 6 fully scanned City University of New York Athletic Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Open Graph image alt100% (6 of 6 sites)
  2. First Contentful Paint (FCP)83% (5 of 6 sites)
  3. Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)67% (4 of 6 sites)
  4. Open Graph image50% (3 of 6 sites)
  5. Open Graph site name50% (3 of 6 sites)
View the data table
Most common usability failures among City University of New York Athletic Conference member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Open Graph image alt100%6
First Contentful Paint (FCP)83%5
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)67%4
Open Graph image50%3
Open Graph site name50%3

What each check means

  • Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
  • First Contentful Paint (FCP). The page starts displaying content within 1.8 seconds. Users see blank screen and think site is broken.
  • Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). The page's main content loads within 2.5 seconds. Users wait too long and leave your page.
  • Open Graph image. The page has a preview image for social media cards. Shared links have no image on social media.
  • Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.

Every education site with one problem

City University of New York Athletic Conference members by usability score

City University of New York Athletic Conference members ranked by usability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 baruch.cuny.edu
CUNY Bernard M Baruch College U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
2 hunter.cuny.edu
CUNY Hunter College U.S. rank 10
12 of 15 checks pass B
2 mec.cuny.edu
CUNY Medgar Evers College U.S. rank 10
12 of 15 checks pass B
3 york.cuny.edu
CUNY York College U.S. rank 21
9 of 15 checks pass D
4 lehman.edu
CUNY Lehman College U.S. rank 25
8 of 16 checks pass F
5 jjay.cuny.edu
CUNY John Jay College of Criminal Justice U.S. rank 33
5 of 15 checks pass F
ccny.cuny.edu
CUNY City College
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/28/2026 and 11/1/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo