Showing Coast-To-Coast Athletic Conference member sites. All education sites
Members of the Coast-To-Coast Athletic Conference (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.
C 71
Average usability score of 6 fully scanned Coast-To-Coast Athletic Conference member sites
11th
of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score
6 of 7
Coast-to-coast athletic conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades
D 68
Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How Coast-To-Coast Athletic Conference usability scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 6 fully scanned Coast-To-Coast Athletic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 6 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Coast-To-Coast Athletic Conference average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 1 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 0 |
| 60 to 69 | 0 |
| 70 to 79 | 2 |
| 80 to 89 | 3 |
| 90 to 100 | 0 |
Coast-To-Coast Athletic Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Coast-To-Coast Athletic Conference: 6 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coast-To-Coast Athletic Conference | 0% (0) | 83% (5) | 17% (1) |
| All education sites | 11% (289) | 42% (1,124) | 47% (1,274) |
Top 3 Coast-To-Coast Athletic Conference member sites by usability score
#1 in Coast-To-Coast Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 9
Christopher Newport University
B 81 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security C
- Usability B
- Readability A
#1 in Coast-To-Coast Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 9
Warren Wilson College
B 81 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability B
- Readability A
#2 in Coast-To-Coast Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 10
University of Mary Washington
B 80 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security C
- Usability B
- Readability A
What each check means
- Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). The page's main content loads within 2.5 seconds. Users wait too long and leave your page.
- First Contentful Paint (FCP). The page starts displaying content within 1.8 seconds. Users see blank screen and think site is broken.
- Time to First Byte (TTFB). The server sends the first byte of content within 0.8 seconds. Slow server delays everything on your page.
- Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS). Page content stays in place as the page loads. Users click wrong buttons by mistake.
Every education site with one problem
- Education websites missing Open Graph tags: 1,859 of 2,687 fully scanned education sites (69%), with every site listed.
Coast-To-Coast Athletic Conference members by usability score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
cnu.edu
Christopher Newport University U.S. rank 9 |
13 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 1 |
warren-wilson.edu
Warren Wilson College U.S. rank 9 |
13 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
umw.edu
University of Mary Washington U.S. rank 10 |
12 of 15 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
regent.edu
Regent University U.S. rank 13 |
12 of 16 checks pass | C |
| 4 |
salisbury.edu
Salisbury University U.S. rank 14 |
11 of 15 checks pass | C |
| 5 |
jwu.edu
Johnson & Wales University U.S. rank 31 |
6 of 16 checks pass | F |
|
ucsc.edu
University of California-Santa Cruz |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 | - |
About usability
Optimize content structure so users quickly find what they need.
Why it's important
Well-written pages help people understand laws, services, and procedures without confusion, reducing calls and office visits.
Risks
- Users cannot understand your information.
Guidance
What we use to grade usability:
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
- Google Search Central
- Web Vitals / Core Web Vitals
- Open Graph
Standards
- Page title
- Page description
- Viewport meta tag
- www resolution
- Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
- First Contentful Paint (FCP)
- Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
- Time to First Byte (TTFB)
- Open Graph site name
- Open Graph type
- Open Graph title
- Open Graph description
- Open Graph URL
- Open Graph image
- Open Graph image alt
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/25/2026 and 11/7/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.