Massachusetts county websites: botability rankings

Botability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 8 Massachusetts county websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 8
  • Last scan: 11/7/2026

C 72

Average botability score of 7 fully scanned Massachusetts county sites

13th

of 49 states, ranked by average botability score

7 of 8

Sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades

C 76

U.S. county average botability score, 2467 fully scanned sites

Massachusetts's state site, mass.gov, could not be fully scanned. State rankings.

How Massachusetts county botability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 7 fully scanned Massachusetts county sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 7 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Massachusetts average
  • U.S. county average
View the data table
How Massachusetts county botability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 693
70 to 791
80 to 893
90 to 1000

Massachusetts counties by botability grade

Each county with a site on our list is colored by that site's grade. Select a county to open its report. The table lists every site.

Barnstable County, MA: grade B, botability score 81 Bristol County, MA: grade D, botability score 66 Dukes County, MA: grade D, botability score 63 Essex County, MA: grade B, botability score 81 Franklin County, MA: not fully scanned, so not graded (status 999) Nantucket, MA: grade C, botability score 72 Norfolk County, MA: grade D, botability score 63 Plymouth County, MA: grade B, botability score 81
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
  • Not fully scanned
  • No site on our list

Massachusetts counties by botability grade, compared with all U.S. counties

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Massachusetts: 7 sites. U.S.: 2467 sites.

  1. MassachusettsB to C (70 to 89): 57% (4 sites)D to F (below 70): 43% (3 sites)
  2. All U.S. countiesA (90 to 100): 18% (445 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 48% (1,184 sites)D to F (below 70): 34% (838 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Massachusetts counties by botability grade, compared with all U.S. counties
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Massachusetts0% (0)57% (4)43% (3)
All U.S. counties18% (445)48% (1,184)34% (838)

Top 3 Massachusetts county sites by botability score

#1 in Massachusetts · U.S. rank 7

Barnstable County, MA

B 81 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability B
  • Security B
  • Usability C
  • Readability A

#1 in Massachusetts · U.S. rank 7

Essex County, MA

B 81 botability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability B
  • Security B
  • Usability F
  • Readability F

#1 in Massachusetts · U.S. rank 7

Plymouth County, MA

B 81 botability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability B
  • Security A
  • Usability F
  • Readability A

Most common botability failures among Massachusetts county sites

Share of the 7 fully scanned Massachusetts county sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to its standard and how to fix it.

  1. GovernmentOrganization Schema.org type100% (7 of 7 sites)
  2. Sitemap in robots.txt43% (3 of 7 sites)
  3. Robots valid43% (3 of 7 sites)
  4. Sitemap status29% (2 of 7 sites)
  5. Sitemap XML29% (2 of 7 sites)
View the data table
Most common botability failures among Massachusetts county sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
GovernmentOrganization Schema.org type100%7
Sitemap in robots.txt43%3
Robots valid43%3
Sitemap status29%2
Sitemap XML29%2

What each check means

  • GovernmentOrganization Schema.org type. Homepage is marked up as an official government organization. Systems cannot verify you are an official government site.
  • Sitemap in robots.txt. The robots.txt file links to the sitemap. Search engines take longer to find your pages.
  • Robots valid. The site's robots.txt file is written correctly so search engines can follow it. Search engines ignore crawling rules they cannot read.
  • Sitemap status. The sitemap file loads and returns a successful response. Search engines cannot find all your pages.
  • Sitemap XML. The sitemap file uses the required XML format. Search engines cannot read your sitemap.

All Massachusetts county sites by botability score

Massachusetts county sites ranked by botability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 capecod.gov
Barnstable County, MA U.S. rank 7
9 of 11 checks pass B
1 essexma.org
Essex County, MA U.S. rank 7
9 of 11 checks pass B
1 plymouthcountyma.gov
Plymouth County, MA U.S. rank 7
9 of 11 checks pass B
2 nantucket-ma.gov
Nantucket, MA U.S. rank 10
8 of 11 checks pass C
3 countyofbristol.net
Bristol County, MA U.S. rank 13
6 of 9 checks pass D
4 dukescounty.gov
Dukes County, MA U.S. rank 14
7 of 11 checks pass D
4 norfolkcounty.org
Norfolk County, MA U.S. rank 14
7 of 11 checks pass D
frcog.org
Franklin County, MA
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 999 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each county site on our county list in Massachusetts. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/7/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo