State websites: usability rankings
Project ScanGov usability rankings for U.S. state government websites, with the most common failures.
D 68
Average usability score of 43 fully scanned state sites
43 of 51
State sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 8, so they're listed without grades
23%
Fully scanned state sites earning an A for usability (10 sites)
47%
Fully scanned state sites earning a D or F for usability (20 sites)
How U.S. state usability scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 43 fully scanned U.S. state sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 43 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 3 |
| 30 to 39 | 4 |
| 40 to 49 | 1 |
| 50 to 59 | 8 |
| 60 to 69 | 4 |
| 70 to 79 | 6 |
| 80 to 89 | 7 |
| 90 to 100 | 10 |
Usability grade by state
Each state is colored by its main site's usability grade. Select a state for its report.
Legend: A B-C D-F Not fully scanned / no data
U.S. state sites by usability grade
Share of the 43 fully scanned U.S. state sites in each grade band
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All U.S. state sites | 23% (10) | 30% (13) | 47% (20) |
What each check means
- Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
- Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
- Open Graph type. The page declares its content type for social media cards. Social media shows wrong content type.
- Open Graph image. The page has a preview image for social media cards. Shared links have no image on social media.
- Open Graph description. The page has a description for social media previews. Shared links have no description on social media.
All state sites by usability score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
maryland.gov
State of Maryland |
16 of 16 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
iowa.gov
State of Iowa |
16 of 16 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
hawaii.gov
State of Hawaii |
16 of 16 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
ny.gov
State of New York |
16 of 16 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
ca.gov
State of California |
16 of 16 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
virginia.gov
State of Virginia |
16 of 16 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
nc.gov
State of North Carolina |
15 of 16 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
nm.gov
State of New Mexico |
15 of 16 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
nj.gov
State of New Jersey |
15 of 16 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
myflorida.gov
State of Florida |
14 of 15 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
texas.gov
State of Texas |
14 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
wisconsin.gov
State of Wisconsin |
14 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
nebraska.gov
State of Nebraska |
14 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 4 |
in.gov
State of Indiana |
13 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 4 |
idaho.gov
State of Idaho |
13 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 4 |
ct.gov
State of Connecticut |
13 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 4 |
illinois.gov
State of Illinois |
13 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 5 |
georgia.gov
State of Georgia |
12 of 16 checks pass | C |
| 5 |
utah.gov
State of Utah |
12 of 16 checks pass | C |
| 5 |
oklahoma.gov
State of Oklahoma |
12 of 16 checks pass | C |
| 5 |
tn.gov
State of Tennessee |
12 of 16 checks pass | C |
| 5 |
arkansas.gov
State of Arkansas |
12 of 16 checks pass | C |
| 6 |
wyo.gov
State of Wyoming |
11 of 15 checks pass | C |
| 7 |
kansas.gov
State of Kansas |
11 of 16 checks pass | D |
| 7 |
pa.gov
State of Pennsylvania |
11 of 16 checks pass | D |
| 8 |
de.gov
State of Delaware |
10 of 15 checks pass | D |
| 9 |
nd.gov
State of North Dakota |
10 of 16 checks pass | D |
| 10 |
ri.gov
State of Rhode Island |
9 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 10 |
oregon.gov
State of Oregon |
9 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 10 |
maine.gov
State of Maine |
9 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 11 |
dc.gov
District of Columbia |
8 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 11 |
alabama.gov
State of Alabama |
8 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 11 |
vermont.gov
State of Vermont |
8 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 11 |
louisiana.gov
State of Louisiana |
8 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 11 |
wv.gov
State of West Virginia |
8 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 12 |
mt.gov
State of Montana |
7 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 13 |
kentucky.gov
State of Kentucky |
5 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 13 |
mississippi.gov
State of Mississippi |
5 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 13 |
alaska.gov
State of Alaska |
5 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 13 |
mn.gov
State of Minnesota |
5 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 14 |
sc.gov
State of South Carolina |
4 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 14 |
sd.gov
State of South Dakota |
4 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 14 |
mo.gov
State of Missouri |
4 of 16 checks pass | F |
About usability
Optimize content structure so users quickly find what they need.
Why it's important
Well-written pages help people understand laws, services, and procedures without confusion, reducing calls and office visits.
Risks
- Users cannot understand your information.
Guidance
What we use to grade usability:
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
- Google Search Central
- Web Vitals / Core Web Vitals
- Open Graph
Standards
- Page title
- Page description
- Viewport meta tag
- www resolution
- Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
- First Contentful Paint (FCP)
- Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
- Time to First Byte (TTFB)
- Open Graph site name
- Open Graph type
- Open Graph title
- Open Graph description
- Open Graph URL
- Open Graph image
- Open Graph image alt
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of the main website of each U.S. state government and the District of Columbia. Scores come from the checks listed on standards.scangov.org. Sites were scanned between 7/27/2026 and 10/2/2026; each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage returned successfully and sent the scanner its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We weren't able to fully scan 8 sites because they did not respond, blocked the scanner, or returned no page content. They appear in the table without grades, each with its scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale, and rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, including every county's raw results, is published in the ScanGov data repository.