City websites: usability rankings
Project ScanGov usability rankings for U.S. city government websites, with the most common failures.
F 51
Average usability score of 215 fully scanned city sites
215 of 267
City sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 52, so they're listed without grades
4%
Fully scanned city sites earning an A for usability (9 sites)
80%
Fully scanned city sites earning a D or F for usability (171 sites)
How U.S. city usability scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 215 fully scanned U.S. city sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 215 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 17 |
| 30 to 39 | 72 |
| 40 to 49 | 20 |
| 50 to 59 | 32 |
| 60 to 69 | 30 |
| 70 to 79 | 16 |
| 80 to 89 | 19 |
| 90 to 100 | 9 |
City sites by usability grade
One dot per city site, colored by its usability grade. Select a dot to open that site's report. The table lists every site.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
- Not fully scanned
11 city sites have no map location yet and appear only in the table.
U.S. city sites by usability grade
Share of the 215 fully scanned U.S. city sites in each grade band
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All U.S. city sites | 4% (9) | 16% (35) | 80% (171) |
What each check means
- Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
- Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
- Open Graph description. The page has a description for social media previews. Shared links have no description on social media.
- Open Graph type. The page declares its content type for social media cards. Social media shows wrong content type.
- Open Graph image. The page has a preview image for social media cards. Shared links have no image on social media.
All city sites by usability score
Page 1 of 3
About usability
Optimize content structure so users quickly find what they need.
Why it's important
Well-written pages help people understand laws, services, and procedures without confusion, reducing calls and office visits.
Risks
- Users cannot understand your information.
Guidance
What we use to grade usability:
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
- Google Search Central
- Web Vitals / Core Web Vitals
- Open Graph
Standards
- Page title
- Page description
- Viewport meta tag
- www resolution
- Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
- First Contentful Paint (FCP)
- Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
- Time to First Byte (TTFB)
- Open Graph site name
- Open Graph type
- Open Graph title
- Open Graph description
- Open Graph URL
- Open Graph image
- Open Graph image alt
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of the main website of each city on our city list. Scores come from the checks listed on standards.scangov.org. Sites were scanned between 7/21/2026 and 10/2/2026; each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage returned successfully and sent the scanner its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We weren't able to fully scan 52 sites because they did not respond, blocked the scanner, or returned no page content. They appear in the table without grades, each with its scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale, and rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, including every county's raw results, is published in the ScanGov data repository.