University Athletic Association: usability rankings

Usability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 7 University Athletic Association member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 7
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the University Athletic Association (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

C 77

Average usability score of 7 fully scanned University Athletic Association member sites

5th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score

7 of 7

University athletic association member sites fully scanned

D 68

Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How University Athletic Association usability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 7 fully scanned University Athletic Association member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 7 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • University Athletic Association average
  • All education average
View the data table
How University Athletic Association usability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 491
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 792
80 to 894
90 to 1000

University Athletic Association by usability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. University Athletic Association: 7 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. University Athletic AssociationB to C (70 to 89): 86% (6 sites)D to F (below 70): 14% (1 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 11% (289 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 42% (1,124 sites)D to F (below 70): 47% (1,274 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
University Athletic Association by usability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
University Athletic Association0% (0)86% (6)14% (1)
All education sites11% (289)42% (1,124)47% (1,274)

Top 3 University Athletic Association member sites by usability score

#1 in University Athletic Association · U.S. education rank 4

Emory University

B 87 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#1 in University Athletic Association · U.S. education rank 4

New York University

B 87 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

#1 in University Athletic Association · U.S. education rank 4

University of Rochester

B 87 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability C
  • Security A
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

Most common usability failures among University Athletic Association member sites

Share of the 7 fully scanned University Athletic Association member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Open Graph image alt86% (6 of 7 sites)
  2. Open Graph description43% (3 of 7 sites)
  3. Open Graph site name43% (3 of 7 sites)
  4. First Contentful Paint (FCP)29% (2 of 7 sites)
  5. Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)29% (2 of 7 sites)
View the data table
Most common usability failures among University Athletic Association member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Open Graph image alt86%6
Open Graph description43%3
Open Graph site name43%3
First Contentful Paint (FCP)29%2
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)29%2

What each check means

  • Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
  • Open Graph description. The page has a description for social media previews. Shared links have no description on social media.
  • Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
  • First Contentful Paint (FCP). The page starts displaying content within 1.8 seconds. Users see blank screen and think site is broken.
  • Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). The page's main content loads within 2.5 seconds. Users wait too long and leave your page.

Every education site with one problem

University Athletic Association members by usability score

University Athletic Association members ranked by usability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 emory.edu
Emory University U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
1 nyu.edu
New York University U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
1 rochester.edu
University of Rochester U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
1 washu.edu
Washington University in St Louis U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
2 case.edu
Case Western Reserve University U.S. rank 13
12 of 16 checks pass C
2 uchicago.edu
University of Chicago U.S. rank 13
12 of 16 checks pass C
3 cmu.edu
Carnegie Mellon University U.S. rank 27
7 of 16 checks pass F

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo