Showing University Athletic Association member sites. All education sites
Members of the University Athletic Association (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.
F 29
Average readability score of 7 fully scanned University Athletic Association member sites
30th
of 96 conferences, ranked by average readability score
7 of 7
University athletic association member sites fully scanned
F 56
Average readability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How University Athletic Association readability scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 7 fully scanned University Athletic Association member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 7 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- University Athletic Association average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 5 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 0 |
| 60 to 69 | 0 |
| 70 to 79 | 0 |
| 80 to 89 | 0 |
| 90 to 100 | 2 |
University Athletic Association by readability grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. University Athletic Association: 7 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| University Athletic Association | 29% (2) | 0% (0) | 71% (5) |
| All education sites | 53% (1,425) | 0% (0) | 41% (1,110) |
Top 3 University Athletic Association member sites by readability score
#1 in University Athletic Association · U.S. education rank 1
Emory University
A 100 readability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability B
- Readability A
#1 in University Athletic Association · U.S. education rank 1
Washington University in St Louis
A 100 readability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability B
- Readability A
#2 in University Athletic Association · U.S. education rank 176
Carnegie Mellon University
F 0 readability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability F
- Readability F
What each check means
- Reading level. Page text reads at or below a 7th grade level so most users can understand it. Users struggle to understand your content.
Every education site with one problem
- Education websites that are hard to read: 1,110 of 2,535 fully scanned education sites (44%), with every site listed.
University Athletic Association members by readability score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
emory.edu
Emory University U.S. rank 1 |
1 of 1 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
washu.edu
Washington University in St Louis U.S. rank 1 |
1 of 1 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
cmu.edu
Carnegie Mellon University U.S. rank 176 |
0 of 1 checks pass | F |
| 2 |
case.edu
Case Western Reserve University U.S. rank 40 |
0 of 1 checks pass | F |
| 2 |
nyu.edu
New York University U.S. rank 24 |
0 of 1 checks pass | F |
| 2 |
uchicago.edu
University of Chicago U.S. rank 74 |
0 of 1 checks pass | F |
| 2 |
rochester.edu
University of Rochester U.S. rank 36 |
0 of 1 checks pass | F |
About readability
Write content at a reading level most users can understand.
Why it's important
Plain language helps people understand services and procedures the first time, reducing calls, errors and office visits.
Risks
- Users cannot understand your content.
Guidance
What we use to grade readability:
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- Automated Readability Index (ARI)
- Flesch–Kincaid readability tests
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
- Plain Writing Act of 2010
Standards
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.