Showing University Athletic Association member sites. All education sites
Members of the University Athletic Association (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.
A 94
Average security score of 7 fully scanned University Athletic Association member sites
1st
of 96 conferences, ranked by average security score
7 of 7
University athletic association member sites fully scanned
B 85
Average security score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How University Athletic Association security scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 7 fully scanned University Athletic Association member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 7 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- University Athletic Association average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 0 |
| 60 to 69 | 0 |
| 70 to 79 | 0 |
| 80 to 89 | 3 |
| 90 to 100 | 4 |
University Athletic Association by security grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. University Athletic Association: 7 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| University Athletic Association | 57% (4) | 43% (3) | 0% (0) |
| All education sites | 19% (505) | 79% (2,113) | 3% (69) |
Top 3 University Athletic Association member sites by security score
#1 in University Athletic Association · U.S. education rank 1
Carnegie Mellon University
A 100 security
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability F
- Readability F
#1 in University Athletic Association · U.S. education rank 1
Case Western Reserve University
A 100 security
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability C
- Readability F
#1 in University Athletic Association · U.S. education rank 1
Emory University
A 100 security
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability B
- Readability A
What each check means
- X-Content-Type-Options. The site tells browsers not to guess the type of files it serves. Browsers might run dangerous files by mistake.
- Errors in the console. The page loads without JavaScript or network errors. Site may have hidden bugs that break features.
University Athletic Association members by security score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
cmu.edu
Carnegie Mellon University U.S. rank 1 |
8 of 8 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
case.edu
Case Western Reserve University U.S. rank 1 |
8 of 8 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
emory.edu
Emory University U.S. rank 1 |
8 of 8 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
rochester.edu
University of Rochester U.S. rank 1 |
8 of 8 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
uchicago.edu
University of Chicago U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
washu.edu
Washington University in St Louis U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
nyu.edu
New York University U.S. rank 4 |
6 of 7 checks pass | B |
About security
Secure your site and protect users with proper security practices.
Why it's important
Strong defenses prevent hackers from stealing personal information and other confidential data.
Risks
- Hackers can steal private information from your site.
Guidance
What we use to grade security:
- CISA Website Security
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- CISA Cybersecurity Performance Goals
- RFC 9116
- OWASP Top 10
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
Standards
- Content security policy (CSP)
- HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)
- security.txt
- X-Content-Type-Options
- Errors in the console
- Clickjacking mitigation
- Paste preventing inputs
- Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure (HTTPS)
- Sponsored top-level domain (sTLD)
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.