United East Conference websites: usability rankings

Usability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 12 United East Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 12
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the United East Conference (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

C 76

Average usability score of 10 fully scanned United East Conference member sites

6th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score

10 of 12

United east conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 2, so they're listed without grades

D 68

Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How United East Conference usability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 10 fully scanned United East Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 10 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • United East Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How United East Conference usability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 491
50 to 590
60 to 692
70 to 792
80 to 893
90 to 1002

United East Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. United East Conference: 10 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. United East ConferenceA (90 to 100): 20% (2 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 50% (5 sites)D to F (below 70): 30% (3 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 11% (289 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 42% (1,124 sites)D to F (below 70): 47% (1,274 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
United East Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
United East Conference20% (2)50% (5)30% (3)
All education sites11% (289)42% (1,124)47% (1,274)

Top 3 United East Conference member sites by usability score

#1 in United East Conference · U.S. education rank 2

Cairn University-Langhorne

A 93 usability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#1 in United East Conference · U.S. education rank 2

Keystone College

A 93 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#2 in United East Conference · U.S. education rank 4

Lancaster Bible College

B 87 usability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

Most common usability failures among United East Conference member sites

Share of the 10 fully scanned United East Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Open Graph image alt100% (10 of 10 sites)
  2. Open Graph description50% (5 of 10 sites)
  3. Open Graph image50% (5 of 10 sites)
  4. Page description40% (4 of 10 sites)
  5. Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)30% (3 of 10 sites)
View the data table
Most common usability failures among United East Conference member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Open Graph image alt100%10
Open Graph description50%5
Open Graph image50%5
Page description40%4
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)30%3

What each check means

  • Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
  • Open Graph description. The page has a description for social media previews. Shared links have no description on social media.
  • Open Graph image. The page has a preview image for social media cards. Shared links have no image on social media.
  • Page description. The page has a meta description that summarizes its content for search results. Search results do not show what your page does.
  • Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS). Page content stays in place as the page loads. Users click wrong buttons by mistake.

Every education site with one problem

United East Conference members by usability score

United East Conference members ranked by usability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 cairn.edu
Cairn University-Langhorne U.S. rank 2
15 of 16 checks pass A
1 keystone.edu
Keystone College U.S. rank 2
15 of 16 checks pass A
2 lbc.edu
Lancaster Bible College U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
3 berks.psu.edu
Pennsylvania State University-Penn State Berks U.S. rank 9
13 of 16 checks pass B
4 smcm.edu
St. Mary's College of Maryland U.S. rank 10
12 of 15 checks pass B
5 cedarcrest.edu
Cedar Crest College U.S. rank 13
12 of 16 checks pass C
5 ndm.edu
Notre Dame of Maryland University U.S. rank 13
12 of 16 checks pass C
6 abington.psu.edu
Pennsylvania State University-Penn State Abington U.S. rank 17
11 of 16 checks pass D
6 brandywine.psu.edu
Pennsylvania State University-Penn State Brandywine U.S. rank 17
11 of 16 checks pass D
7 wilson.edu
Wilson College U.S. rank 27
7 of 16 checks pass F
gallaudet.edu
Gallaudet University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -
pct.edu
Pennsylvania College of Technology
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/25/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 2 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo