State University of New York Athletic Conference: usability rankings

Usability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 12 State University of New York Athletic Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 12
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Showing State University of New York Athletic Conference member sites. All education sites

Members of the State University of New York Athletic Conference (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

D 61

Average usability score of 10 fully scanned State University of New York Athletic Conference member sites

21st

of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score

10 of 12

State university of new york athletic conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 2, so they're listed without grades

D 68

Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How State University of New York Athletic Conference usability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 10 fully scanned State University of New York Athletic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

  • State University of New York Athletic Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 392
40 to 490
50 to 592
60 to 693
70 to 790
80 to 892
90 to 1001

State University of New York Athletic Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. State University of New York Athletic Conference: 10 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. State University of New York Athletic Conference
  2. All education sites
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
State University of New York Athletic Conference10% (1)20% (2)70% (7)
All education sites11% (289)42% (1,124)47% (1,274)

Top 3 State University of New York Athletic Conference member sites by usability score

#1 in State University of New York Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 2

SUNY Morrisville

A 93 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#2 in State University of New York Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 9

SUNY College of Technology at Canton

B 81 usability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#3 in State University of New York Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 10

State University of New York at Plattsburgh

B 80 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

Most common usability failures among State University of New York Athletic Conference member sites

Share of the 10 fully scanned State University of New York Athletic Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Open Graph image alt90%
  2. Open Graph site name80%
  3. Open Graph type70%
  4. Open Graph URL70%
  5. Open Graph description60%
View the data table
CheckShare failingSites failing
Open Graph image alt90%9
Open Graph site name80%8
Open Graph type70%7
Open Graph URL70%7
Open Graph description60%6

What each check means

  • Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
  • Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
  • Open Graph type. The page declares its content type for social media cards. Social media shows wrong content type.
  • Open Graph URL. The page has a canonical URL for social media sharing. Shared links may point to wrong page.
  • Open Graph description. The page has a description for social media previews. Shared links have no description on social media.

Every education site with one problem

State University of New York Athletic Conference members by usability score

Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 morrisville.edu
SUNY Morrisville U.S. rank 2 		14 of 15 checks pass A
2 canton.edu
SUNY College of Technology at Canton U.S. rank 9 		13 of 16 checks pass B
3 plattsburgh.edu
State University of New York at Plattsburgh U.S. rank 10 		12 of 15 checks pass B
4 suny.oneonta.edu
SUNY Oneonta U.S. rank 17 		11 of 16 checks pass D
5 suny.buffalostate.edu
SUNY Buffalo State University U.S. rank 20 		10 of 16 checks pass D
6 alfredstate.edu
SUNY College of Technology at Alfred U.S. rank 21 		9 of 15 checks pass D
7 cobleskill.edu
SUNY College of Agriculture and Technology at Cobleskill U.S. rank 23 		9 of 16 checks pass F
8 oswego.edu
State University of New York at Oswego U.S. rank 25 		8 of 16 checks pass F
9 potsdam.edu
SUNY College at Potsdam U.S. rank 33 		5 of 15 checks pass F
10 delhi.edu
SUNY College of Technology at Delhi U.S. rank 34 		5 of 16 checks pass F
cortland.edu
State University of New York at Cortland 		Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asked us not to. Status 998 -
fredonia.edu
SUNY at Fredonia 		Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/26/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 2 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo