Sun Belt Conference websites: usability rankings

Usability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 14 Sun Belt Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 14
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Sun Belt Conference (NCAA Division I), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

D 61

Average usability score of 12 fully scanned Sun Belt Conference member sites

21st

of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score

12 of 14

Sun belt conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 2, so they're listed without grades

D 68

Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Sun Belt Conference usability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 12 fully scanned Sun Belt Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 12 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Sun Belt Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Sun Belt Conference usability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 493
50 to 592
60 to 692
70 to 794
80 to 891
90 to 1000

Sun Belt Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Sun Belt Conference: 12 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Sun Belt ConferenceB to C (70 to 89): 42% (5 sites)D to F (below 70): 58% (7 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 11% (289 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 42% (1,124 sites)D to F (below 70): 47% (1,274 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Sun Belt Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Sun Belt Conference0% (0)42% (5)58% (7)
All education sites11% (289)42% (1,124)47% (1,274)

Top 3 Sun Belt Conference member sites by usability score

#1 in Sun Belt Conference · U.S. education rank 5

Marshall University

B 86 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#2 in Sun Belt Conference · U.S. education rank 14

Arkansas State University

C 73 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability C
  • Readability A

#2 in Sun Belt Conference · U.S. education rank 14

Georgia Southern University

C 73 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability C
  • Readability A

Most common usability failures among Sun Belt Conference member sites

Share of the 12 fully scanned Sun Belt Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Open Graph image alt92% (11 of 12 sites)
  2. First Contentful Paint (FCP)83% (10 of 12 sites)
  3. Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)83% (10 of 12 sites)
  4. Open Graph image67% (8 of 12 sites)
  5. Open Graph site name58% (7 of 12 sites)
View the data table
Most common usability failures among Sun Belt Conference member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Open Graph image alt92%11
First Contentful Paint (FCP)83%10
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)83%10
Open Graph image67%8
Open Graph site name58%7

What each check means

  • Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
  • First Contentful Paint (FCP). The page starts displaying content within 1.8 seconds. Users see blank screen and think site is broken.
  • Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). The page's main content loads within 2.5 seconds. Users wait too long and leave your page.
  • Open Graph image. The page has a preview image for social media cards. Shared links have no image on social media.
  • Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.

Every education site with one problem

Sun Belt Conference members by usability score

Sun Belt Conference members ranked by usability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 marshall.edu
Marshall University U.S. rank 5
13 of 15 checks pass B
2 astate.edu
Arkansas State University U.S. rank 14
11 of 15 checks pass C
2 georgiasouthern.edu
Georgia Southern University U.S. rank 14
11 of 15 checks pass C
2 gsu.edu
Georgia State University U.S. rank 14
11 of 15 checks pass C
3 appstate.edu
Appalachian State University U.S. rank 15
10 of 14 checks pass C
4 latech.edu
Louisiana Tech University U.S. rank 18
10 of 15 checks pass D
5 odu.edu
Old Dominion University U.S. rank 21
9 of 15 checks pass D
6 louisiana.edu
University of Louisiana at Lafayette U.S. rank 23
9 of 16 checks pass F
7 ulm.edu
University of Louisiana at Monroe U.S. rank 25
8 of 16 checks pass F
8 troy.edu
Troy University U.S. rank 26
7 of 15 checks pass F
9 southalabama.edu
University of South Alabama U.S. rank 29
6 of 15 checks pass F
9 usm.edu
University of Southern Mississippi U.S. rank 29
6 of 15 checks pass F
coastal.edu
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asked us not to. Status 998 -
jmu.edu
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 404 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/25/2026 and 10/31/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 2 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo