Sun Belt Conference websites ranked by digital experience

Rankings, grades, and the most common failures for 14 Sun Belt Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 14
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Sun Belt Conference (NCAA Division I), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 85

Average overall score of 12 fully scanned Sun Belt Conference member sites

7th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average overall score

12 of 14

Sun belt conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 2, so they're listed without grades

B 85

Average overall score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Sun Belt Conference overall scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 12 fully scanned Sun Belt Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 12 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Sun Belt Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Sun Belt Conference overall scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 791
80 to 899
90 to 1002

Sun Belt Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Sun Belt Conference: 12 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Sun Belt ConferenceA (90 to 100): 17% (2 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 83% (10 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 25% (659 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 73% (1,965 sites)D to F (below 70): 2% (63 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Sun Belt Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Sun Belt Conference17% (2)83% (10)0% (0)
All education sites25% (659)73% (1,965)2% (63)

Sun Belt Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites

Average of the 12 fully scanned Sun Belt Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. The comparison covers 2687 fully scanned education sites.

  1. Accessibility93All education: 91
  2. Botability91All education: 89
  3. Security88All education: 85
  4. Usability61All education: 68
  5. Readability83All education: 56
  • Sun Belt Conference
  • All education
View the data table
Sun Belt Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites
IndicatorSun Belt Conference averageAll education average
Accessibility9391
Botability9189
Security8885
Usability6168
Readability8356

Top 3 Sun Belt Conference member sites by overall score

#1 in Sun Belt Conference · U.S. education rank 6

Marshall University

A 95 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#2 in Sun Belt Conference · U.S. education rank 8

Georgia Southern University

A 93 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability C
  • Readability A

#3 in Sun Belt Conference · U.S. education rank 13

Arkansas State University

B 88 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability C
  • Readability A

Most common failures by indicator

The check Sun Belt Conference member sites fail most often in each indicator. Each indicator page lists the top five.

Sun Belt Conference members by overall score

Sun Belt Conference members ranked by overall score
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
1 marshall.edu
Marshall University U.S. rank 6
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
2 georgiasouthern.edu
Georgia Southern University U.S. rank 8
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
A
3 astate.edu
Arkansas State University U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
B
3 gsu.edu
Georgia State University U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
B
3 latech.edu
Louisiana Tech University U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
4 usm.edu
University of Southern Mississippi U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
5 louisiana.edu
University of Louisiana at Lafayette U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
6 odu.edu
Old Dominion University U.S. rank 18
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
7 appstate.edu
Appalachian State University U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
B
7 troy.edu
Troy University U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
8 southalabama.edu
University of South Alabama U.S. rank 21
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
9 ulm.edu
University of Louisiana at Monroe U.S. rank 25
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
coastal.edu
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asked us not to. Status 998 -
jmu.edu
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 404 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/25/2026 and 10/31/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 2 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo