State University of New York Athletic Conference: accessibility rankings

Accessibility scores, grades, and the most common failures for 12 State University of New York Athletic Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 12
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the State University of New York Athletic Conference (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

A 94

Average accessibility score of 10 fully scanned State University of New York Athletic Conference member sites

4th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average accessibility score

10 of 12

State university of new york athletic conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 2, so they're listed without grades

A 91

Average accessibility score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How State University of New York Athletic Conference accessibility scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 10 fully scanned State University of New York Athletic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 10 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • State University of New York Athletic Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How State University of New York Athletic Conference accessibility scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 790
80 to 892
90 to 1008

State University of New York Athletic Conference by accessibility grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. State University of New York Athletic Conference: 10 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. State University of New York Athletic ConferenceA (90 to 100): 80% (8 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 20% (2 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 66% (1,765 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 33% (888 sites)D to F (below 70): 1% (34 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
State University of New York Athletic Conference by accessibility grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
State University of New York Athletic Conference80% (8)20% (2)0% (0)
All education sites66% (1,765)33% (888)1% (34)

Top 3 State University of New York Athletic Conference member sites by accessibility score

#1 in State University of New York Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 1

SUNY Buffalo State University

A 100 accessibility

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability D
  • Readability A

#1 in State University of New York Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 1

SUNY College of Technology at Alfred

A 100 accessibility

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability D
  • Readability A

#1 in State University of New York Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 1

SUNY Morrisville

A 100 accessibility

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

Most common accessibility failures among State University of New York Athletic Conference member sites

Share of the 10 fully scanned State University of New York Athletic Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to its standard and how to fix it.

  1. Document has a main landmark30% (3 of 10 sites)
  2. Touch targets have sufficient size and spacing30% (3 of 10 sites)
  3. [aria-hidden="true"] elements do not contain focusable descendents20% (2 of 10 sites)
  4. Links have a discernible name20% (2 of 10 sites)
  5. Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order20% (2 of 10 sites)
View the data table
Most common accessibility failures among State University of New York Athletic Conference member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Document has a main landmark30%3
Touch targets have sufficient size and spacing30%3
[aria-hidden="true"] elements do not contain focusable descendents20%2
Links have a discernible name20%2
Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order20%2

What each check means

State University of New York Athletic Conference members by accessibility score

State University of New York Athletic Conference members ranked by accessibility score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 suny.buffalostate.edu
SUNY Buffalo State University U.S. rank 1
29 of 29 checks pass A
1 alfredstate.edu
SUNY College of Technology at Alfred U.S. rank 1
31 of 31 checks pass A
1 morrisville.edu
SUNY Morrisville U.S. rank 1
29 of 29 checks pass A
2 plattsburgh.edu
State University of New York at Plattsburgh U.S. rank 3
30 of 31 checks pass A
2 potsdam.edu
SUNY College at Potsdam U.S. rank 3
31 of 32 checks pass A
3 suny.oneonta.edu
SUNY Oneonta U.S. rank 5
32 of 34 checks pass A
4 oswego.edu
State University of New York at Oswego U.S. rank 6
29 of 31 checks pass A
5 delhi.edu
SUNY College of Technology at Delhi U.S. rank 9
30 of 33 checks pass A
6 canton.edu
SUNY College of Technology at Canton U.S. rank 10
26 of 29 checks pass B
7 cobleskill.edu
SUNY College of Agriculture and Technology at Cobleskill U.S. rank 14
24 of 28 checks pass B
cortland.edu
State University of New York at Cortland
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asked us not to. Status 998 -
fredonia.edu
SUNY at Fredonia
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/26/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 2 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo