Showing St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member sites. All education sites
Members of the St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.
D 65
Average usability score of 8 fully scanned St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member sites
17th
of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score
8 of 8
St. louis intercollegiate athletic conference member sites fully scanned
D 68
Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference usability scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 8 fully scanned St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 8 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 1 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 1 |
| 60 to 69 | 3 |
| 70 to 79 | 1 |
| 80 to 89 | 2 |
| 90 to 100 | 0 |
St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference: 8 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference | 0% (0) | 38% (3) | 63% (5) |
| All education sites | 11% (289) | 42% (1,124) | 47% (1,274) |
Top 3 St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member sites by usability score
#1 in St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 9
Blackburn College
B 81 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security C
- Usability B
- Readability A
#1 in St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 9
Greenville University
B 81 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability B
- Readability -
#2 in St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 13
Spalding University
C 75 usability
- Accessibility B
- Botability A
- Security C
- Usability C
- Readability A
What each check means
- Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
- Open Graph description. The page has a description for social media previews. Shared links have no description on social media.
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). The page's main content loads within 2.5 seconds. Users wait too long and leave your page.
- Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
- Open Graph URL. The page has a canonical URL for social media sharing. Shared links may point to wrong page.
Every education site with one problem
- Education websites missing Open Graph tags: 1,859 of 2,687 fully scanned education sites (69%), with every site listed.
St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference members by usability score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
blackburn.edu
Blackburn College U.S. rank 9 |
13 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 1 |
greenville.edu
Greenville University U.S. rank 9 |
13 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
spalding.edu
Spalding University U.S. rank 13 |
12 of 16 checks pass | C |
| 3 |
lyon.edu
Lyon College U.S. rank 17 |
11 of 16 checks pass | D |
| 4 |
webster.edu
Webster University U.S. rank 18 |
10 of 15 checks pass | D |
| 5 |
wcmo.edu
Westminster College U.S. rank 20 |
10 of 16 checks pass | D |
| 6 |
principiacollege.edu
Principia College U.S. rank 23 |
9 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 7 |
muw.edu
Mississippi University for Women U.S. rank 33 |
5 of 15 checks pass | F |
About usability
Optimize content structure so users quickly find what they need.
Why it's important
Well-written pages help people understand laws, services, and procedures without confusion, reducing calls and office visits.
Risks
- Users cannot understand your information.
Guidance
What we use to grade usability:
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
- Google Search Central
- Web Vitals / Core Web Vitals
- Open Graph
Standards
- Page title
- Page description
- Viewport meta tag
- www resolution
- Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
- First Contentful Paint (FCP)
- Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
- Time to First Byte (TTFB)
- Open Graph site name
- Open Graph type
- Open Graph title
- Open Graph description
- Open Graph URL
- Open Graph image
- Open Graph image alt
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/28/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.