St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference: usability rankings

Usability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 8 St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 8
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

D 65

Average usability score of 8 fully scanned St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member sites

17th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score

8 of 8

St. louis intercollegiate athletic conference member sites fully scanned

D 68

Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference usability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 8 fully scanned St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 8 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference usability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 391
40 to 490
50 to 591
60 to 693
70 to 791
80 to 892
90 to 1000

St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference: 8 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic ConferenceB to C (70 to 89): 38% (3 sites)D to F (below 70): 63% (5 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 11% (289 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 42% (1,124 sites)D to F (below 70): 47% (1,274 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference0% (0)38% (3)63% (5)
All education sites11% (289)42% (1,124)47% (1,274)

Top 3 St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member sites by usability score

#1 in St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 9

Blackburn College

B 81 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#1 in St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 9

Greenville University

B 81 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability -

#2 in St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 13

Spalding University

C 75 usability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability C
  • Readability A

Most common usability failures among St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member sites

Share of the 8 fully scanned St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Open Graph image alt100% (8 of 8 sites)
  2. Open Graph description63% (5 of 8 sites)
  3. Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)50% (4 of 8 sites)
  4. Open Graph site name50% (4 of 8 sites)
  5. Open Graph URL50% (4 of 8 sites)
View the data table
Most common usability failures among St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Open Graph image alt100%8
Open Graph description63%5
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)50%4
Open Graph site name50%4
Open Graph URL50%4

What each check means

  • Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
  • Open Graph description. The page has a description for social media previews. Shared links have no description on social media.
  • Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). The page's main content loads within 2.5 seconds. Users wait too long and leave your page.
  • Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
  • Open Graph URL. The page has a canonical URL for social media sharing. Shared links may point to wrong page.

Every education site with one problem

St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference members by usability score

St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference members ranked by usability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 blackburn.edu
Blackburn College U.S. rank 9
13 of 16 checks pass B
1 greenville.edu
Greenville University U.S. rank 9
13 of 16 checks pass B
2 spalding.edu
Spalding University U.S. rank 13
12 of 16 checks pass C
3 lyon.edu
Lyon College U.S. rank 17
11 of 16 checks pass D
4 webster.edu
Webster University U.S. rank 18
10 of 15 checks pass D
5 wcmo.edu
Westminster College U.S. rank 20
10 of 16 checks pass D
6 principiacollege.edu
Principia College U.S. rank 23
9 of 16 checks pass F
7 muw.edu
Mississippi University for Women U.S. rank 33
5 of 15 checks pass F

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/28/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo