Southwestern Athletic Conf.: usability rankings

Usability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 12 Southwestern Athletic Conf. member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 12
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Southwestern Athletic Conf. (NCAA Division I), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

D 62

Average usability score of 9 fully scanned Southwestern Athletic Conf. member sites

20th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score

9 of 12

Southwestern athletic conf. member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 3, so they're listed without grades

D 68

Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Southwestern Athletic Conf. usability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 9 fully scanned Southwestern Athletic Conf. member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 9 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Southwestern Athletic Conf. average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Southwestern Athletic Conf. usability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 291
30 to 391
40 to 490
50 to 592
60 to 692
70 to 790
80 to 893
90 to 1000

Southwestern Athletic Conf. by usability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Southwestern Athletic Conf.: 9 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Southwestern Athletic Conf.B to C (70 to 89): 33% (3 sites)D to F (below 70): 67% (6 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 11% (289 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 42% (1,124 sites)D to F (below 70): 47% (1,274 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Southwestern Athletic Conf. by usability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Southwestern Athletic Conf.0% (0)33% (3)67% (6)
All education sites11% (289)42% (1,124)47% (1,274)

Top 3 Southwestern Athletic Conf. member sites by usability score

#1 in Southwestern Athletic Conf. · U.S. education rank 4

Texas Southern University

B 87 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security D
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#1 in Southwestern Athletic Conf. · U.S. education rank 4

University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff

B 87 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#2 in Southwestern Athletic Conf. · U.S. education rank 10

Alcorn State University

B 80 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

Most common usability failures among Southwestern Athletic Conf. member sites

Share of the 9 fully scanned Southwestern Athletic Conf. member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Open Graph image alt100% (9 of 9 sites)
  2. Open Graph image78% (7 of 9 sites)
  3. First Contentful Paint (FCP)56% (5 of 9 sites)
  4. Open Graph site name56% (5 of 9 sites)
  5. Open Graph description44% (4 of 9 sites)
View the data table
Most common usability failures among Southwestern Athletic Conf. member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Open Graph image alt100%9
Open Graph image78%7
First Contentful Paint (FCP)56%5
Open Graph site name56%5
Open Graph description44%4

What each check means

  • Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
  • Open Graph image. The page has a preview image for social media cards. Shared links have no image on social media.
  • First Contentful Paint (FCP). The page starts displaying content within 1.8 seconds. Users see blank screen and think site is broken.
  • Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
  • Open Graph description. The page has a description for social media previews. Shared links have no description on social media.

Every education site with one problem

Southwestern Athletic Conf. members by usability score

Southwestern Athletic Conf. members ranked by usability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 tsu.edu
Texas Southern University U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
1 uapb.edu
University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
2 alcorn.edu
Alcorn State University U.S. rank 10
12 of 15 checks pass B
3 alasu.edu
Alabama State University U.S. rank 17
11 of 16 checks pass D
4 jsums.edu
Jackson State University U.S. rank 18
10 of 15 checks pass D
5 famu.edu
Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University U.S. rank 23
9 of 16 checks pass F
6 mvsu.edu
Mississippi Valley State University U.S. rank 25
8 of 16 checks pass F
7 gram.edu
Grambling State University U.S. rank 31
6 of 16 checks pass F
8 cookman.edu
Bethune-Cookman University U.S. rank 35
4 of 14 checks pass F
aamu.edu
Alabama A & M University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 -
pvamu.edu
Prairie View A & M University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asks crawlers to wait longer than we can. Status 997 -
subr.edu
Southern University and A & M College
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 3 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo