Southwestern Athletic Conf.: botability rankings

Botability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 12 Southwestern Athletic Conf. member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 12
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Southwestern Athletic Conf. (NCAA Division I), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 86

Average botability score of 9 fully scanned Southwestern Athletic Conf. member sites

12th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average botability score

9 of 12

Southwestern athletic conf. member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 3, so they're listed without grades

B 89

Average botability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Southwestern Athletic Conf. botability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 9 fully scanned Southwestern Athletic Conf. member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 9 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Southwestern Athletic Conf. average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Southwestern Athletic Conf. botability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 591
60 to 690
70 to 791
80 to 892
90 to 1005

Southwestern Athletic Conf. by botability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Southwestern Athletic Conf.: 9 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Southwestern Athletic Conf.A (90 to 100): 56% (5 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 33% (3 sites)D to F (below 70): 11% (1 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 71% (1,899 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 25% (660 sites)D to F (below 70): 5% (128 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Southwestern Athletic Conf. by botability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Southwestern Athletic Conf.56% (5)33% (3)11% (1)
All education sites71% (1,899)25% (660)5% (128)

Top 3 Southwestern Athletic Conf. member sites by botability score

#1 in Southwestern Athletic Conf. · U.S. education rank 1

Alabama State University

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability D
  • Readability F

#1 in Southwestern Athletic Conf. · U.S. education rank 1

Grambling State University

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability F
  • Readability F

#1 in Southwestern Athletic Conf. · U.S. education rank 1

Texas Southern University

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security D
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

Most common botability failures among Southwestern Athletic Conf. member sites

Share of the 9 fully scanned Southwestern Athletic Conf. member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Link text44% (4 of 9 sites)
  2. Sitemap in robots.txt33% (3 of 9 sites)
  3. Sitemap status22% (2 of 9 sites)
  4. Sitemap XML22% (2 of 9 sites)
  5. Canonical11% (1 of 9 sites)
View the data table
Most common botability failures among Southwestern Athletic Conf. member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Link text44%4
Sitemap in robots.txt33%3
Sitemap status22%2
Sitemap XML22%2
Canonical11%1

What each check means

  • Link text. Links use descriptive text that tells users and search engines where they go. Users cannot tell where links go.
  • Sitemap in robots.txt. The robots.txt file links to the sitemap. Search engines take longer to find your pages.
  • Sitemap status. The sitemap file loads and returns a successful response. Search engines cannot find all your pages.
  • Sitemap XML. The sitemap file uses the required XML format. Search engines cannot read your sitemap.
  • Canonical. Each page declares a preferred URL so search engines show the right link. Search rankings split across duplicate pages.

Every education site with one problem

Southwestern Athletic Conf. members by botability score

Southwestern Athletic Conf. members ranked by botability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 alasu.edu
Alabama State University U.S. rank 1
9 of 9 checks pass A
1 gram.edu
Grambling State University U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
1 tsu.edu
Texas Southern University U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
2 alcorn.edu
Alcorn State University U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
2 uapb.edu
University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
3 jsums.edu
Jackson State University U.S. rank 3
8 of 9 checks pass B
4 cookman.edu
Bethune-Cookman University U.S. rank 7
9 of 11 checks pass B
5 famu.edu
Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University U.S. rank 11
8 of 11 checks pass C
6 mvsu.edu
Mississippi Valley State University U.S. rank 19
6 of 11 checks pass F
aamu.edu
Alabama A & M University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 -
pvamu.edu
Prairie View A & M University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asks crawlers to wait longer than we can. Status 997 -
subr.edu
Southern University and A & M College
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 3 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo