Southwestern Athletic Conf.: website rankings

Rankings, grades, and the most common failures for 12 Southwestern Athletic Conf. member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 12
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Southwestern Athletic Conf. (NCAA Division I), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 82

Average overall score of 9 fully scanned Southwestern Athletic Conf. member sites

10th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average overall score

9 of 12

Southwestern athletic conf. member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 3, so they're listed without grades

B 85

Average overall score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Southwestern Athletic Conf. overall scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 9 fully scanned Southwestern Athletic Conf. member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 9 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Southwestern Athletic Conf. average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Southwestern Athletic Conf. overall scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 793
80 to 894
90 to 1002

Southwestern Athletic Conf. by overall grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Southwestern Athletic Conf.: 9 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Southwestern Athletic Conf.A (90 to 100): 22% (2 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 78% (7 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 25% (659 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 73% (1,965 sites)D to F (below 70): 2% (63 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Southwestern Athletic Conf. by overall grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Southwestern Athletic Conf.22% (2)78% (7)0% (0)
All education sites25% (659)73% (1,965)2% (63)

Southwestern Athletic Conf. average score by indicator, compared with all education sites

Average of the 9 fully scanned Southwestern Athletic Conf. member sites, score 0 to 100. The comparison covers 2687 fully scanned education sites.

  1. Accessibility92All education: 91
  2. Botability86All education: 89
  3. Security85All education: 85
  4. Usability62All education: 68
  5. Readability44All education: 56
  • Southwestern Athletic Conf.
  • All education
View the data table
Southwestern Athletic Conf. average score by indicator, compared with all education sites
IndicatorSouthwestern Athletic Conf. averageAll education average
Accessibility9291
Botability8689
Security8585
Usability6268
Readability4456

Top 3 Southwestern Athletic Conf. member sites by overall score

#1 in Southwestern Athletic Conf. · U.S. education rank 9

Texas Southern University

A 92 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security D
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#1 in Southwestern Athletic Conf. · U.S. education rank 9

University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff

A 92 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#2 in Southwestern Athletic Conf. · U.S. education rank 12

Alabama State University

B 89 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability D
  • Readability F

Most common failures by indicator

The check Southwestern Athletic Conf. member sites fail most often in each indicator. Each indicator page lists the top five.

Southwestern Athletic Conf. members by overall score

Southwestern Athletic Conf. members ranked by overall score
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
1 tsu.edu
Texas Southern University U.S. rank 9
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade D
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
1 uapb.edu
University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff U.S. rank 9
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
2 alasu.edu
Alabama State University U.S. rank 12
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
3 alcorn.edu
Alcorn State University U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
4 famu.edu
Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University U.S. rank 21
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
4 jsums.edu
Jackson State University U.S. rank 21
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
5 mvsu.edu
Mississippi Valley State University U.S. rank 26
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade F
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
6 cookman.edu
Bethune-Cookman University U.S. rank 27
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
6 gram.edu
Grambling State University U.S. rank 27
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
aamu.edu
Alabama A & M University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 -
pvamu.edu
Prairie View A & M University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asks crawlers to wait longer than we can. Status 997 -
subr.edu
Southern University and A & M College
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 3 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo