Northeast Conference websites: usability rankings

Usability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 8 Northeast Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 8
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Showing Northeast Conference member sites. All education sites

Members of the Northeast Conference (NCAA Division I), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

D 67

Average usability score of 8 fully scanned Northeast Conference member sites

15th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score

8 of 8

Northeast conference member sites fully scanned

D 68

Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Northeast Conference usability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 8 fully scanned Northeast Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

  • Northeast Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 491
50 to 593
60 to 690
70 to 791
80 to 892
90 to 1001

Northeast Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Northeast Conference: 8 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Northeast Conference
  2. All education sites
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Northeast Conference13% (1)38% (3)50% (4)
All education sites11% (289)42% (1,124)47% (1,274)

Top 3 Northeast Conference member sites by usability score

#1 in Northeast Conference · U.S. education rank 2

Le Moyne College

A 93 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#2 in Northeast Conference · U.S. education rank 4

Wagner College

B 87 usability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability B
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

#3 in Northeast Conference · U.S. education rank 9

Stonehill College

B 81 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability B
  • Security A
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

Most common usability failures among Northeast Conference member sites

Share of the 8 fully scanned Northeast Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Open Graph image alt100%
  2. Open Graph site name63%
  3. Open Graph URL63%
  4. Open Graph description50%
  5. Open Graph title50%
View the data table
CheckShare failingSites failing
Open Graph image alt100%8
Open Graph site name63%5
Open Graph URL63%5
Open Graph description50%4
Open Graph title50%4

What each check means

  • Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
  • Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
  • Open Graph URL. The page has a canonical URL for social media sharing. Shared links may point to wrong page.
  • Open Graph description. The page has a description for social media previews. Shared links have no description on social media.
  • Open Graph title. The page has a title for social media previews. Shared links have no title on social media.

Every education site with one problem

Northeast Conference members by usability score

Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 lemoyne.edu
Le Moyne College U.S. rank 2 		15 of 16 checks pass A
2 wagner.edu
Wagner College U.S. rank 4 		14 of 16 checks pass B
3 stonehill.edu
Stonehill College U.S. rank 9 		13 of 16 checks pass B
4 newhaven.edu
University of New Haven U.S. rank 13 		12 of 16 checks pass C
5 mercyhurst.edu
Mercyhurst University U.S. rank 23 		9 of 16 checks pass F
6 csu.edu
Chicago State University U.S. rank 25 		8 of 16 checks pass F
6 liu.edu
Long Island University U.S. rank 25 		8 of 16 checks pass F
7 ccsu.edu
Central Connecticut State University U.S. rank 27 		7 of 16 checks pass F

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/28/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo