Northeast Conference websites: accessibility rankings

Accessibility scores, grades, and the most common failures for 8 Northeast Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 8
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Northeast Conference (NCAA Division I), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

A 90

Average accessibility score of 8 fully scanned Northeast Conference member sites

8th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average accessibility score

8 of 8

Northeast conference member sites fully scanned

A 91

Average accessibility score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Northeast Conference accessibility scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 8 fully scanned Northeast Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 8 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Northeast Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Northeast Conference accessibility scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 591
60 to 690
70 to 790
80 to 891
90 to 1006

Northeast Conference by accessibility grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Northeast Conference: 8 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Northeast ConferenceA (90 to 100): 75% (6 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 13% (1 sites)D to F (below 70): 13% (1 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 66% (1,765 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 33% (888 sites)D to F (below 70): 1% (34 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Northeast Conference by accessibility grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Northeast Conference75% (6)13% (1)13% (1)
All education sites66% (1,765)33% (888)1% (34)

Top 3 Northeast Conference member sites by accessibility score

#1 in Northeast Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Le Moyne College

A 100 accessibility

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#1 in Northeast Conference · U.S. education rank 1

University of New Haven

A 100 accessibility

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability C
  • Readability F

#2 in Northeast Conference · U.S. education rank 3

Stonehill College

A 96 accessibility

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability B
  • Security A
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

Most common accessibility failures among Northeast Conference member sites

Share of the 8 fully scanned Northeast Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to its standard and how to fix it.

  1. Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order50% (4 of 8 sites)
  2. Image aspect ratio38% (3 of 8 sites)
  3. [aria-hidden="true"] elements do not contain focusable descendents25% (2 of 8 sites)
  4. Links have a discernible name25% (2 of 8 sites)
  5. Document has a main landmark25% (2 of 8 sites)
View the data table

What each check means

Northeast Conference members by accessibility score

Northeast Conference members ranked by accessibility score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 lemoyne.edu
Le Moyne College U.S. rank 1
29 of 29 checks pass A
1 newhaven.edu
University of New Haven U.S. rank 1
33 of 33 checks pass A
2 stonehill.edu
Stonehill College U.S. rank 3
30 of 31 checks pass A
3 csu.edu
Chicago State University U.S. rank 6
29 of 31 checks pass A
3 mercyhurst.edu
Mercyhurst University U.S. rank 6
29 of 31 checks pass A
4 ccsu.edu
Central Connecticut State University U.S. rank 8
32 of 35 checks pass A
5 wagner.edu
Wagner College U.S. rank 11
30 of 34 checks pass B
6 liu.edu
Long Island University U.S. rank 39
14 of 24 checks pass F

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/28/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo