Northeast Conference websites: security rankings

Security scores, grades, and the most common failures for 8 Northeast Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 8
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Northeast Conference (NCAA Division I), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

A 90

Average security score of 8 fully scanned Northeast Conference member sites

4th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average security score

8 of 8

Northeast conference member sites fully scanned

B 85

Average security score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Northeast Conference security scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 8 fully scanned Northeast Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 8 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Northeast Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Northeast Conference security scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 790
80 to 896
90 to 1002

Northeast Conference by security grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Northeast Conference: 8 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Northeast ConferenceA (90 to 100): 25% (2 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 75% (6 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 19% (505 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 79% (2,113 sites)D to F (below 70): 3% (69 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Northeast Conference by security grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Northeast Conference25% (2)75% (6)0% (0)
All education sites19% (505)79% (2,113)3% (69)

Top 3 Northeast Conference member sites by security score

#1 in Northeast Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Stonehill College

A 100 security

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability B
  • Security A
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

#1 in Northeast Conference · U.S. education rank 1

University of New Haven

A 100 security

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability C
  • Readability F

#2 in Northeast Conference · U.S. education rank 3

Central Connecticut State University

B 87 security

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability B
  • Security B
  • Usability F
  • Readability A

Most common security failures among Northeast Conference member sites

Share of the 8 fully scanned Northeast Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to its standard and how to fix it.

  1. X-Content-Type-Options38% (3 of 8 sites)
  2. Errors in the console38% (3 of 8 sites)
View the data table
Most common security failures among Northeast Conference member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
X-Content-Type-Options38%3
Errors in the console38%3

What each check means

  • X-Content-Type-Options. The site tells browsers not to guess the type of files it serves. Browsers might run dangerous files by mistake.
  • Errors in the console. The page loads without JavaScript or network errors. Site may have hidden bugs that break features.

Northeast Conference members by security score

Northeast Conference members ranked by security score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 stonehill.edu
Stonehill College U.S. rank 1
8 of 8 checks pass A
1 newhaven.edu
University of New Haven U.S. rank 1
8 of 8 checks pass A
2 ccsu.edu
Central Connecticut State University U.S. rank 3
7 of 8 checks pass B
2 csu.edu
Chicago State University U.S. rank 3
7 of 8 checks pass B
2 lemoyne.edu
Le Moyne College U.S. rank 3
7 of 8 checks pass B
2 liu.edu
Long Island University U.S. rank 3
7 of 8 checks pass B
2 mercyhurst.edu
Mercyhurst University U.S. rank 3
7 of 8 checks pass B
2 wagner.edu
Wagner College U.S. rank 3
7 of 8 checks pass B

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/28/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo