Northern Athletics Collegiate Conference: usability rankings

Usability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 13 Northern Athletics Collegiate Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 13
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Northern Athletics Collegiate Conference (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

D 67

Average usability score of 12 fully scanned Northern Athletics Collegiate Conference member sites

15th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score

12 of 13

Northern athletics collegiate conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades

D 68

Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Northern Athletics Collegiate Conference usability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 12 fully scanned Northern Athletics Collegiate Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 12 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Northern Athletics Collegiate Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Northern Athletics Collegiate Conference usability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 595
60 to 691
70 to 793
80 to 893
90 to 1000

Northern Athletics Collegiate Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Northern Athletics Collegiate Conference: 12 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Northern Athletics Collegiate ConferenceB to C (70 to 89): 50% (6 sites)D to F (below 70): 50% (6 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 11% (289 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 42% (1,124 sites)D to F (below 70): 47% (1,274 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Northern Athletics Collegiate Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Northern Athletics Collegiate Conference0% (0)50% (6)50% (6)
All education sites11% (289)42% (1,124)47% (1,274)

Top 3 Northern Athletics Collegiate Conference member sites by usability score

#1 in Northern Athletics Collegiate Conference · U.S. education rank 4

Benedictine University

B 87 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

#1 in Northern Athletics Collegiate Conference · U.S. education rank 4

Milwaukee School of Engineering

B 87 usability

  • Accessibility C
  • Botability B
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

#2 in Northern Athletics Collegiate Conference · U.S. education rank 9

Concordia University-Chicago

B 81 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability B
  • Security A
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

Most common usability failures among Northern Athletics Collegiate Conference member sites

Share of the 12 fully scanned Northern Athletics Collegiate Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Open Graph image alt100% (12 of 12 sites)
  2. Open Graph image58% (7 of 12 sites)
  3. Open Graph site name50% (6 of 12 sites)
  4. Open Graph title50% (6 of 12 sites)
  5. Open Graph type50% (6 of 12 sites)
View the data table
Most common usability failures among Northern Athletics Collegiate Conference member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Open Graph image alt100%12
Open Graph image58%7
Open Graph site name50%6
Open Graph title50%6
Open Graph type50%6

What each check means

  • Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
  • Open Graph image. The page has a preview image for social media cards. Shared links have no image on social media.
  • Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
  • Open Graph title. The page has a title for social media previews. Shared links have no title on social media.
  • Open Graph type. The page declares its content type for social media cards. Social media shows wrong content type.

Every education site with one problem

Northern Athletics Collegiate Conference members by usability score

Northern Athletics Collegiate Conference members ranked by usability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 ben.edu
Benedictine University U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
1 msoe.edu
Milwaukee School of Engineering U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
2 cuchicago.edu
Concordia University-Chicago U.S. rank 9
13 of 16 checks pass B
3 edgewood.edu
Edgewood College U.S. rank 13
12 of 16 checks pass C
3 lakeland.edu
Lakeland University U.S. rank 13
12 of 16 checks pass C
3 marianuniversity.edu
Marian University U.S. rank 13
12 of 16 checks pass C
4 rockford.edu
Rockford University U.S. rank 20
10 of 16 checks pass D
5 iit.edu
Illinois Institute of Technology U.S. rank 23
9 of 16 checks pass F
6 aurora.edu
Aurora University U.S. rank 25
8 of 16 checks pass F
6 dom.edu
Dominican University U.S. rank 25
8 of 16 checks pass F
6 snc.edu
Saint Norbert College U.S. rank 25
8 of 16 checks pass F
6 wlc.edu
Wisconsin Lutheran College U.S. rank 25
8 of 16 checks pass F
cuw.edu
Concordia University-Wisconsin
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo