Northern Sun Intercollegiate Conference: usability rankings

Usability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 14 Northern Sun Intercollegiate Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 14
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Northern Sun Intercollegiate Conference (NCAA Division II), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

D 66

Average usability score of 14 fully scanned Northern Sun Intercollegiate Conference member sites

16th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score

14 of 14

Northern sun intercollegiate conference member sites fully scanned

D 68

Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Northern Sun Intercollegiate Conference usability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 14 fully scanned Northern Sun Intercollegiate Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 14 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Northern Sun Intercollegiate Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Northern Sun Intercollegiate Conference usability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 391
40 to 492
50 to 590
60 to 697
70 to 790
80 to 893
90 to 1001

Northern Sun Intercollegiate Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Northern Sun Intercollegiate Conference: 14 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Northern Sun Intercollegiate ConferenceA (90 to 100): 7% (1 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 21% (3 sites)D to F (below 70): 71% (10 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 11% (289 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 42% (1,124 sites)D to F (below 70): 47% (1,274 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Northern Sun Intercollegiate Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Northern Sun Intercollegiate Conference7% (1)21% (3)71% (10)
All education sites11% (289)42% (1,124)47% (1,274)

Top 3 Northern Sun Intercollegiate Conference member sites by usability score

#1 in Northern Sun Intercollegiate Conference · U.S. education rank 1

University of Minnesota-Duluth

A 100 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability F

#2 in Northern Sun Intercollegiate Conference · U.S. education rank 4

Concordia University-Saint Paul

B 87 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability B
  • Readability -

#2 in Northern Sun Intercollegiate Conference · U.S. education rank 4

University of Jamestown

B 87 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

Most common usability failures among Northern Sun Intercollegiate Conference member sites

Share of the 14 fully scanned Northern Sun Intercollegiate Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Open Graph image alt86% (12 of 14 sites)
  2. Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)57% (8 of 14 sites)
  3. Open Graph image57% (8 of 14 sites)
  4. Open Graph site name57% (8 of 14 sites)
  5. First Contentful Paint (FCP)50% (7 of 14 sites)
View the data table
Most common usability failures among Northern Sun Intercollegiate Conference member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Open Graph image alt86%12
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)57%8
Open Graph image57%8
Open Graph site name57%8
First Contentful Paint (FCP)50%7

What each check means

  • Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
  • Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). The page's main content loads within 2.5 seconds. Users wait too long and leave your page.
  • Open Graph image. The page has a preview image for social media cards. Shared links have no image on social media.
  • Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
  • First Contentful Paint (FCP). The page starts displaying content within 1.8 seconds. Users see blank screen and think site is broken.

Every education site with one problem

Northern Sun Intercollegiate Conference members by usability score

Northern Sun Intercollegiate Conference members ranked by usability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 d.umn.edu
University of Minnesota-Duluth U.S. rank 1
16 of 16 checks pass A
2 csp.edu
Concordia University-Saint Paul U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
2 uj.edu
University of Jamestown U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
3 bemidjistate.edu
Bemidji State University U.S. rank 10
12 of 15 checks pass B
4 augie.edu
Augustana University U.S. rank 17
11 of 16 checks pass D
4 mnstate.edu
Minnesota State University Moorhead U.S. rank 17
11 of 16 checks pass D
4 umary.edu
University of Mary U.S. rank 17
11 of 16 checks pass D
5 stcloudstate.edu
Saint Cloud State University U.S. rank 18
10 of 15 checks pass D
5 smsu.edu
Southwest Minnesota State University U.S. rank 18
10 of 15 checks pass D
6 mnsu.edu
Minnesota State University-Mankato U.S. rank 21
9 of 15 checks pass D
6 wsc.edu
Wayne State College U.S. rank 21
9 of 15 checks pass D
7 northern.edu
Northern State University U.S. rank 27
7 of 16 checks pass F
8 minotstateu.edu
Minot State University U.S. rank 29
6 of 15 checks pass F
9 winona.edu
Winona State University U.S. rank 33
5 of 15 checks pass F

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo