Lone Star Conference websites ranked by digital experience

Rankings, grades, and the most common failures for 18 Lone Star Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 18
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Lone Star Conference (NCAA Division II), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 86

Average overall score of 18 fully scanned Lone Star Conference member sites

6th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average overall score

18 of 18

Lone star conference member sites fully scanned

B 85

Average overall score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Lone Star Conference overall scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 18 fully scanned Lone Star Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 18 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Lone Star Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Lone Star Conference overall scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 792
80 to 898
90 to 1008

Lone Star Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Lone Star Conference: 18 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Lone Star ConferenceA (90 to 100): 44% (8 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 56% (10 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 25% (659 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 73% (1,965 sites)D to F (below 70): 2% (63 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Lone Star Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Lone Star Conference44% (8)56% (10)0% (0)
All education sites25% (659)73% (1,965)2% (63)

Lone Star Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites

Average of the 18 fully scanned Lone Star Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. The comparison covers 2687 fully scanned education sites.

  1. Accessibility92All education: 91
  2. Botability89All education: 89
  3. Security84All education: 85
  4. Usability74All education: 68
  5. Readability67All education: 56
  • Lone Star Conference
  • All education
View the data table
Lone Star Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites
IndicatorLone Star Conference averageAll education average
Accessibility9291
Botability8989
Security8485
Usability7468
Readability6756

Top 3 Lone Star Conference member sites by overall score

#1 in Lone Star Conference · U.S. education rank 7

Angelo State University

A 94 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#2 in Lone Star Conference · U.S. education rank 8

Oklahoma Christian University

A 93 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#2 in Lone Star Conference · U.S. education rank 8

Western New Mexico University

A 93 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability F

Most common failures by indicator

The check Lone Star Conference member sites fail most often in each indicator. Each indicator page lists the top five.

Lone Star Conference members by overall score

Lone Star Conference members ranked by overall score
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
1 angelo.edu
Angelo State University U.S. rank 7
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
2 oc.edu
Oklahoma Christian University U.S. rank 8
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
2 wnmu.edu
Western New Mexico University U.S. rank 8
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
3 msutexas.edu
Midwestern State University U.S. rank 9
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
3 wtamu.edu
West Texas A & M University U.S. rank 9
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
4 utdallas.edu
The University of Texas at Dallas U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
5 lcu.edu
Lubbock Christian University U.S. rank 11
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
5 stedwards.edu
Saint Edward's University U.S. rank 11
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
A
6 tamuk.edu
Texas A&M University-Kingsville U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
B
7 dbu.edu
Dallas Baptist University U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade D
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
8 sulross.edu
Sul Ross State University U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
9 stmarytx.edu
St. Mary's University U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
B
10 enmu.edu
Eastern New Mexico University-Main Campus U.S. rank 18
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
11 twu.edu
Texas Woman's University U.S. rank 19
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
12 uttyler.edu
The University of Texas at Tyler U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
13 cameron.edu
Cameron University U.S. rank 21
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
B
14 utpb.edu
The University of Texas Permian Basin U.S. rank 25
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade D
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
15 tamiu.edu
Texas A & M International University U.S. rank 26
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo