Lone Star Conference websites: usability rankings

Usability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 18 Lone Star Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 18
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Lone Star Conference (NCAA Division II), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

C 74

Average usability score of 18 fully scanned Lone Star Conference member sites

8th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score

18 of 18

Lone star conference member sites fully scanned

D 68

Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Lone Star Conference usability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 18 fully scanned Lone Star Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 18 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Lone Star Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Lone Star Conference usability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 391
40 to 491
50 to 591
60 to 692
70 to 793
80 to 897
90 to 1003

Lone Star Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Lone Star Conference: 18 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Lone Star ConferenceA (90 to 100): 17% (3 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 56% (10 sites)D to F (below 70): 28% (5 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 11% (289 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 42% (1,124 sites)D to F (below 70): 47% (1,274 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Lone Star Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Lone Star Conference17% (3)56% (10)28% (5)
All education sites11% (289)42% (1,124)47% (1,274)

Top 3 Lone Star Conference member sites by usability score

#1 in Lone Star Conference · U.S. education rank 2

Midwestern State University

A 93 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability B
  • Security C
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#1 in Lone Star Conference · U.S. education rank 2

Oklahoma Christian University

A 93 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#1 in Lone Star Conference · U.S. education rank 2

Western New Mexico University

A 93 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability F

Most common usability failures among Lone Star Conference member sites

Share of the 18 fully scanned Lone Star Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Open Graph image alt83% (15 of 18 sites)
  2. Open Graph site name67% (12 of 18 sites)
  3. First Contentful Paint (FCP)39% (7 of 18 sites)
  4. Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)39% (7 of 18 sites)
  5. Open Graph image39% (7 of 18 sites)
View the data table
Most common usability failures among Lone Star Conference member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Open Graph image alt83%15
Open Graph site name67%12
First Contentful Paint (FCP)39%7
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)39%7
Open Graph image39%7

What each check means

  • Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
  • Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
  • First Contentful Paint (FCP). The page starts displaying content within 1.8 seconds. Users see blank screen and think site is broken.
  • Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). The page's main content loads within 2.5 seconds. Users wait too long and leave your page.
  • Open Graph image. The page has a preview image for social media cards. Shared links have no image on social media.

Every education site with one problem

Lone Star Conference members by usability score

Lone Star Conference members ranked by usability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 msutexas.edu
Midwestern State University U.S. rank 2
15 of 16 checks pass A
1 oc.edu
Oklahoma Christian University U.S. rank 2
15 of 16 checks pass A
1 wnmu.edu
Western New Mexico University U.S. rank 2
15 of 16 checks pass A
2 dbu.edu
Dallas Baptist University U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
2 sulross.edu
Sul Ross State University U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
2 utdallas.edu
The University of Texas at Dallas U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
3 angelo.edu
Angelo State University U.S. rank 9
13 of 16 checks pass B
3 lcu.edu
Lubbock Christian University U.S. rank 9
13 of 16 checks pass B
3 twu.edu
Texas Woman's University U.S. rank 9
13 of 16 checks pass B
3 wtamu.edu
West Texas A & M University U.S. rank 9
13 of 16 checks pass B
4 stedwards.edu
Saint Edward's University U.S. rank 13
12 of 16 checks pass C
4 stmarytx.edu
St. Mary's University U.S. rank 13
12 of 16 checks pass C
4 tamuk.edu
Texas A&M University-Kingsville U.S. rank 13
12 of 16 checks pass C
5 enmu.edu
Eastern New Mexico University-Main Campus U.S. rank 18
10 of 15 checks pass D
6 uttyler.edu
The University of Texas at Tyler U.S. rank 21
9 of 15 checks pass D
7 utpb.edu
The University of Texas Permian Basin U.S. rank 25
8 of 16 checks pass F
8 tamiu.edu
Texas A & M International University U.S. rank 29
6 of 15 checks pass F
9 cameron.edu
Cameron University U.S. rank 33
5 of 15 checks pass F

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo