Showing Little East Conference member sites. All education sites
Members of the Little East Conference (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.
D 69
Average usability score of 6 fully scanned Little East Conference member sites
13th
of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score
6 of 8
Little east conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 2, so they're listed without grades
D 68
Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How Little East Conference usability scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 6 fully scanned Little East Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 6 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Little East Conference average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 1 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 0 |
| 60 to 69 | 1 |
| 70 to 79 | 1 |
| 80 to 89 | 3 |
| 90 to 100 | 0 |
Little East Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Little East Conference: 6 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Little East Conference | 0% (0) | 67% (4) | 33% (2) |
| All education sites | 11% (289) | 42% (1,124) | 47% (1,274) |
Top 3 Little East Conference member sites by usability score
#1 in Little East Conference · U.S. education rank 4
University of Southern Maine
B 87 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability B
- Readability A
#2 in Little East Conference · U.S. education rank 9
University of Massachusetts-Boston
B 81 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability B
- Readability A
#3 in Little East Conference · U.S. education rank 10
University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth
B 80 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability B
- Readability F
What each check means
- First Contentful Paint (FCP). The page starts displaying content within 1.8 seconds. Users see blank screen and think site is broken.
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). The page's main content loads within 2.5 seconds. Users wait too long and leave your page.
- Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
- Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
- Page description. The page has a meta description that summarizes its content for search results. Search results do not show what your page does.
Every education site with one problem
- Education websites missing Open Graph tags: 1,859 of 2,687 fully scanned education sites (69%), with every site listed.
Little East Conference members by usability score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
usm.maine.edu
University of Southern Maine U.S. rank 4 |
14 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
umb.edu
University of Massachusetts-Boston U.S. rank 9 |
13 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
umassd.edu
University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth U.S. rank 10 |
12 of 15 checks pass | B |
| 4 |
easternct.edu
Eastern Connecticut State University U.S. rank 14 |
11 of 15 checks pass | C |
| 5 |
plymouth.edu
Plymouth State University U.S. rank 21 |
9 of 15 checks pass | D |
| 6 |
ric.edu
Rhode Island College U.S. rank 33 |
5 of 15 checks pass | F |
|
keene.edu
Keene State College |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 | - | |
|
wcsu.edu
Western Connecticut State University |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 | - |
About usability
Optimize content structure so users quickly find what they need.
Why it's important
Well-written pages help people understand laws, services, and procedures without confusion, reducing calls and office visits.
Risks
- Users cannot understand your information.
Guidance
What we use to grade usability:
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
- Google Search Central
- Web Vitals / Core Web Vitals
- Open Graph
Standards
- Page title
- Page description
- Viewport meta tag
- www resolution
- Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
- First Contentful Paint (FCP)
- Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
- Time to First Byte (TTFB)
- Open Graph site name
- Open Graph type
- Open Graph title
- Open Graph description
- Open Graph URL
- Open Graph image
- Open Graph image alt
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/25/2026 and 11/7/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 2 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.