Little East Conference websites: usability rankings

Usability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 8 Little East Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 8
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Little East Conference (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

D 69

Average usability score of 6 fully scanned Little East Conference member sites

13th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score

6 of 8

Little east conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 2, so they're listed without grades

D 68

Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Little East Conference usability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 6 fully scanned Little East Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 6 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Little East Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Little East Conference usability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 391
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 691
70 to 791
80 to 893
90 to 1000

Little East Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Little East Conference: 6 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Little East ConferenceB to C (70 to 89): 67% (4 sites)D to F (below 70): 33% (2 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 11% (289 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 42% (1,124 sites)D to F (below 70): 47% (1,274 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Little East Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Little East Conference0% (0)67% (4)33% (2)
All education sites11% (289)42% (1,124)47% (1,274)

Top 3 Little East Conference member sites by usability score

#1 in Little East Conference · U.S. education rank 4

University of Southern Maine

B 87 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#2 in Little East Conference · U.S. education rank 9

University of Massachusetts-Boston

B 81 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#3 in Little East Conference · U.S. education rank 10

University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth

B 80 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

Most common usability failures among Little East Conference member sites

Share of the 6 fully scanned Little East Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. First Contentful Paint (FCP)67% (4 of 6 sites)
  2. Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)67% (4 of 6 sites)
  3. Open Graph image alt67% (4 of 6 sites)
  4. Open Graph site name50% (3 of 6 sites)
  5. Page description33% (2 of 6 sites)
View the data table
Most common usability failures among Little East Conference member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
First Contentful Paint (FCP)67%4
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)67%4
Open Graph image alt67%4
Open Graph site name50%3
Page description33%2

What each check means

  • First Contentful Paint (FCP). The page starts displaying content within 1.8 seconds. Users see blank screen and think site is broken.
  • Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). The page's main content loads within 2.5 seconds. Users wait too long and leave your page.
  • Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
  • Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
  • Page description. The page has a meta description that summarizes its content for search results. Search results do not show what your page does.

Every education site with one problem

Little East Conference members by usability score

Little East Conference members ranked by usability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 usm.maine.edu
University of Southern Maine U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
2 umb.edu
University of Massachusetts-Boston U.S. rank 9
13 of 16 checks pass B
3 umassd.edu
University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth U.S. rank 10
12 of 15 checks pass B
4 easternct.edu
Eastern Connecticut State University U.S. rank 14
11 of 15 checks pass C
5 plymouth.edu
Plymouth State University U.S. rank 21
9 of 15 checks pass D
6 ric.edu
Rhode Island College U.S. rank 33
5 of 15 checks pass F
keene.edu
Keene State College
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -
wcsu.edu
Western Connecticut State University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/25/2026 and 11/7/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 2 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo