Little East Conference websites ranked by digital experience

Rankings, grades, and the most common failures for 8 Little East Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 8
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Little East Conference (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 86

Average overall score of 6 fully scanned Little East Conference member sites

6th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average overall score

6 of 8

Little east conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 2, so they're listed without grades

B 85

Average overall score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Little East Conference overall scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 6 fully scanned Little East Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 6 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Little East Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Little East Conference overall scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 792
80 to 891
90 to 1003

Little East Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Little East Conference: 6 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Little East ConferenceA (90 to 100): 50% (3 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 50% (3 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 25% (659 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 73% (1,965 sites)D to F (below 70): 2% (63 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Little East Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Little East Conference50% (3)50% (3)0% (0)
All education sites25% (659)73% (1,965)2% (63)

Little East Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites

Average of the 6 fully scanned Little East Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. The comparison covers 2687 fully scanned education sites.

  1. Accessibility94All education: 91
  2. Botability88All education: 89
  3. Security89All education: 85
  4. Usability69All education: 68
  5. Readability67All education: 56
  • Little East Conference
  • All education
View the data table
Little East Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites
IndicatorLittle East Conference averageAll education average
Accessibility9491
Botability8889
Security8985
Usability6968
Readability6756

Top 3 Little East Conference member sites by overall score

#1 in Little East Conference · U.S. education rank 5

University of Massachusetts-Boston

A 96 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#2 in Little East Conference · U.S. education rank 9

University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth

A 92 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

#3 in Little East Conference · U.S. education rank 10

University of Southern Maine

A 91 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

Most common failures by indicator

The check Little East Conference member sites fail most often in each indicator. Each indicator page lists the top five.

Little East Conference members by overall score

Little East Conference members ranked by overall score
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
1 umb.edu
University of Massachusetts-Boston U.S. rank 5
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
2 umassd.edu
University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth U.S. rank 9
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
3 usm.maine.edu
University of Southern Maine U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
4 easternct.edu
Eastern Connecticut State University U.S. rank 19
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
B
5 plymouth.edu
Plymouth State University U.S. rank 22
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
C
6 ric.edu
Rhode Island College U.S. rank 23
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
keene.edu
Keene State College
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -
wcsu.edu
Western Connecticut State University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/25/2026 and 11/7/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 2 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo