Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference: website rankings

Rankings, grades, and the most common failures for 10 Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 10
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 84

Average overall score of 8 fully scanned Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference member sites

8th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average overall score

8 of 10

Heartland collegiate athletic conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 2, so they're listed without grades

B 85

Average overall score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference overall scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 8 fully scanned Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 8 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference overall scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 691
70 to 791
80 to 893
90 to 1003

Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference: 8 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Heartland Collegiate Athletic ConferenceA (90 to 100): 38% (3 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 50% (4 sites)D to F (below 70): 13% (1 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 25% (659 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 73% (1,965 sites)D to F (below 70): 2% (63 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference38% (3)50% (4)13% (1)
All education sites25% (659)73% (1,965)2% (63)

Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites

Average of the 8 fully scanned Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. The comparison covers 2687 fully scanned education sites.

  1. Accessibility86All education: 91
  2. Botability92All education: 89
  3. Security80All education: 85
  4. Usability77All education: 68
  5. Readability63All education: 56
  • Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference
  • All education
View the data table
Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites
IndicatorHeartland Collegiate Athletic Conference averageAll education average
Accessibility8691
Botability9289
Security8085
Usability7768
Readability6356

Top 3 Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference member sites by overall score

#1 in Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 11

Hanover College

A 90 overall

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#1 in Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 11

Mount St. Joseph University

A 90 overall

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#1 in Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 11

Transylvania University

A 90 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability C
  • Readability A

Most common failures by indicator

The check Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference member sites fail most often in each indicator. Each indicator page lists the top five.

Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference members by overall score

Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference members ranked by overall score
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
1 hanover.edu
Hanover College U.S. rank 11
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
1 msj.edu
Mount St. Joseph University U.S. rank 11
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
1 transy.edu
Transylvania University U.S. rank 11
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
A
2 berea.edu
Berea College U.S. rank 12
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
3 bluffton.edu
Bluffton University U.S. rank 18
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
3 earlham.edu
Earlham College U.S. rank 18
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
4 manchester.edu
Manchester University U.S. rank 23
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
C
5 rose-hulman.edu
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology U.S. rank 32
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade D
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
D
anderson.edu
Anderson University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 999 -
franklincollege.edu
Franklin College
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 999 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 2 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo