Gulf South Conference websites ranked by digital experience

Rankings, grades, and the most common failures for 11 Gulf South Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 11
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Gulf South Conference (NCAA Division II), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 85

Average overall score of 9 fully scanned Gulf South Conference member sites

7th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average overall score

9 of 11

Gulf south conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 2, so they're listed without grades

B 85

Average overall score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Gulf South Conference overall scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 9 fully scanned Gulf South Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 9 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Gulf South Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Gulf South Conference overall scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 793
80 to 894
90 to 1002

Gulf South Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Gulf South Conference: 9 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Gulf South ConferenceA (90 to 100): 22% (2 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 78% (7 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 25% (659 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 73% (1,965 sites)D to F (below 70): 2% (63 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Gulf South Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Gulf South Conference22% (2)78% (7)0% (0)
All education sites25% (659)73% (1,965)2% (63)

Gulf South Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites

Average of the 9 fully scanned Gulf South Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. The comparison covers 2687 fully scanned education sites.

  1. Accessibility87All education: 91
  2. Botability90All education: 89
  3. Security86All education: 85
  4. Usability73All education: 68
  5. Readability78All education: 56
  • Gulf South Conference
  • All education
View the data table
Gulf South Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites
IndicatorGulf South Conference averageAll education average
Accessibility8791
Botability9089
Security8685
Usability7368
Readability7856

Top 3 Gulf South Conference member sites by overall score

#1 in Gulf South Conference · U.S. education rank 4

Union University

A 97 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#2 in Gulf South Conference · U.S. education rank 7

Mississippi College

A 94 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#3 in Gulf South Conference · U.S. education rank 14

University of Montevallo

B 87 overall

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability C
  • Readability A

Most common failures by indicator

The check Gulf South Conference member sites fail most often in each indicator. Each indicator page lists the top five.

Gulf South Conference members by overall score

Gulf South Conference members ranked by overall score
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
1 uu.edu
Union University U.S. rank 4
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
2 mc.edu
Mississippi College U.S. rank 7
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
3 montevallo.edu
University of Montevallo U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
B
3 uwa.edu
University of West Alabama U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
B
4 aum.edu
Auburn University at Montgomery U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
B
5 leeuniversity.edu
Lee University U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
B
6 trevecca.edu
Trevecca Nazarene University U.S. rank 22
  • Accessibility grade C
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
C
7 uah.edu
University of Alabama in Huntsville U.S. rank 23
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
8 valdosta.edu
Valdosta State University U.S. rank 26
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
cbu.edu
Christian Brothers University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -
deltastate.edu
Delta State University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/28/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 2 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo