Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference: usability rankings

Usability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 10 Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 10
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

C 77

Average usability score of 8 fully scanned Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference member sites

5th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score

8 of 10

Heartland collegiate athletic conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 2, so they're listed without grades

D 68

Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference usability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 8 fully scanned Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 8 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference usability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 491
50 to 590
60 to 692
70 to 791
80 to 892
90 to 1002

Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference: 8 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Heartland Collegiate Athletic ConferenceA (90 to 100): 25% (2 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 38% (3 sites)D to F (below 70): 38% (3 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 11% (289 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 42% (1,124 sites)D to F (below 70): 47% (1,274 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference25% (2)38% (3)38% (3)
All education sites11% (289)42% (1,124)47% (1,274)

Top 3 Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference member sites by usability score

#1 in Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Mount St. Joseph University

A 100 usability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#2 in Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 2

Hanover College

A 93 usability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#3 in Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 4

Bluffton University

B 87 usability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

Most common usability failures among Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference member sites

Share of the 8 fully scanned Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to its standard and how to fix it.

  1. Open Graph image alt88% (7 of 8 sites)
  2. Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)50% (4 of 8 sites)
  3. First Contentful Paint (FCP)38% (3 of 8 sites)
  4. Time to First Byte (TTFB)38% (3 of 8 sites)
  5. Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)25% (2 of 8 sites)
View the data table
Most common usability failures among Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Open Graph image alt88%7
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)50%4
First Contentful Paint (FCP)38%3
Time to First Byte (TTFB)38%3
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)25%2

What each check means

Every education site with one problem

Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference members by usability score

Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference members ranked by usability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 msj.edu
Mount St. Joseph University U.S. rank 1
15 of 15 checks pass A
2 hanover.edu
Hanover College U.S. rank 2
15 of 16 checks pass A
3 bluffton.edu
Bluffton University U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
3 earlham.edu
Earlham College U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
4 transy.edu
Transylvania University U.S. rank 13
12 of 16 checks pass C
5 berea.edu
Berea College U.S. rank 17
11 of 16 checks pass D
6 manchester.edu
Manchester University U.S. rank 20
10 of 16 checks pass D
7 rose-hulman.edu
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology U.S. rank 29
6 of 15 checks pass F
anderson.edu
Anderson University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 999 -
franklincollege.edu
Franklin College
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 999 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 2 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo