Showing Conference Carolinas member sites. All education sites
Members of the Conference Carolinas (NCAA Division II), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.
C 75
Average usability score of 10 fully scanned Conference Carolinas member sites
7th
of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score
10 of 12
Conference carolinas member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 2, so they're listed without grades
D 68
Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How Conference Carolinas usability scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 10 fully scanned Conference Carolinas member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 10 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Conference Carolinas average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 1 |
| 40 to 49 | 1 |
| 50 to 59 | 1 |
| 60 to 69 | 0 |
| 70 to 79 | 1 |
| 80 to 89 | 2 |
| 90 to 100 | 4 |
Conference Carolinas by usability grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Conference Carolinas: 10 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conference Carolinas | 40% (4) | 30% (3) | 30% (3) |
| All education sites | 11% (289) | 42% (1,124) | 47% (1,274) |
Top 3 Conference Carolinas member sites by usability score
#1 in Conference Carolinas · U.S. education rank 2
Converse University
A 93 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability A
- Readability F
#1 in Conference Carolinas · U.S. education rank 2
Ferrum College
A 93 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability A
- Readability A
#1 in Conference Carolinas · U.S. education rank 2
North Greenville University
A 93 usability
- Accessibility C
- Botability A
- Security C
- Usability A
- Readability F
What each check means
- Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
- Open Graph image. The page has a preview image for social media cards. Shared links have no image on social media.
- Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
- First Contentful Paint (FCP). The page starts displaying content within 1.8 seconds. Users see blank screen and think site is broken.
- Open Graph description. The page has a description for social media previews. Shared links have no description on social media.
Every education site with one problem
- Education websites missing Open Graph tags: 1,859 of 2,687 fully scanned education sites (69%), with every site listed.
Conference Carolinas members by usability score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
converse.edu
Converse University U.S. rank 2 |
15 of 16 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
ferrum.edu
Ferrum College U.S. rank 2 |
15 of 16 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
ngu.edu
North Greenville University U.S. rank 2 |
15 of 16 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
yhc.edu
Young Harris College U.S. rank 2 |
15 of 16 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
uncp.edu
University of North Carolina at Pembroke U.S. rank 4 |
14 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
king.edu
King University U.S. rank 9 |
13 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 4 |
fmarion.edu
Francis Marion University U.S. rank 14 |
11 of 15 checks pass | C |
| 5 |
swu.edu
Southern Wesleyan University U.S. rank 23 |
9 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 6 |
lmc.edu
Lees-McRae College U.S. rank 27 |
7 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 7 |
shorter.edu
Shorter University U.S. rank 33 |
5 of 15 checks pass | F |
|
erskine.edu
Erskine College |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - | |
|
umo.edu
University of Mount Olive |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 999 | - |
About usability
Optimize content structure so users quickly find what they need.
Why it's important
Well-written pages help people understand laws, services, and procedures without confusion, reducing calls and office visits.
Risks
- Users cannot understand your information.
Guidance
What we use to grade usability:
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
- Google Search Central
- Web Vitals / Core Web Vitals
- Open Graph
Standards
- Page title
- Page description
- Viewport meta tag
- www resolution
- Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
- First Contentful Paint (FCP)
- Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
- Time to First Byte (TTFB)
- Open Graph site name
- Open Graph type
- Open Graph title
- Open Graph description
- Open Graph URL
- Open Graph image
- Open Graph image alt
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 2 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.