Conference Carolinas websites: botability rankings

Botability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 12 Conference Carolinas member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 12
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Conference Carolinas (NCAA Division II), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

A 94

Average botability score of 10 fully scanned Conference Carolinas member sites

4th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average botability score

10 of 12

Conference carolinas member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 2, so they're listed without grades

B 89

Average botability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Conference Carolinas botability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 10 fully scanned Conference Carolinas member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 10 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Conference Carolinas average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Conference Carolinas botability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 790
80 to 891
90 to 1009

Conference Carolinas by botability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Conference Carolinas: 10 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Conference CarolinasA (90 to 100): 90% (9 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 10% (1 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 71% (1,899 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 25% (660 sites)D to F (below 70): 5% (128 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Conference Carolinas by botability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Conference Carolinas90% (9)10% (1)0% (0)
All education sites71% (1,899)25% (660)5% (128)

Top 3 Conference Carolinas member sites by botability score

#1 in Conference Carolinas · U.S. education rank 1

King University

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

#1 in Conference Carolinas · U.S. education rank 1

North Greenville University

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility C
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability A
  • Readability F

#1 in Conference Carolinas · U.S. education rank 1

Southern Wesleyan University

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability F
  • Readability A

Most common botability failures among Conference Carolinas member sites

Share of the 10 fully scanned Conference Carolinas member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Sitemap in robots.txt30% (3 of 10 sites)
  2. Link text30% (3 of 10 sites)
View the data table
Most common botability failures among Conference Carolinas member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Sitemap in robots.txt30%3
Link text30%3

What each check means

  • Sitemap in robots.txt. The robots.txt file links to the sitemap. Search engines take longer to find your pages.
  • Link text. Links use descriptive text that tells users and search engines where they go. Users cannot tell where links go.

Every education site with one problem

Conference Carolinas members by botability score

Conference Carolinas members ranked by botability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 king.edu
King University U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
1 ngu.edu
North Greenville University U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
1 swu.edu
Southern Wesleyan University U.S. rank 1
9 of 9 checks pass A
1 uncp.edu
University of North Carolina at Pembroke U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
1 yhc.edu
Young Harris College U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
2 converse.edu
Converse University U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
2 ferrum.edu
Ferrum College U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
2 fmarion.edu
Francis Marion University U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
2 shorter.edu
Shorter University U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
3 lmc.edu
Lees-McRae College U.S. rank 7
9 of 11 checks pass B
erskine.edu
Erskine College
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 -
umo.edu
University of Mount Olive
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 999 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 2 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo