Showing Collegiate Conference of the South member sites. All education sites
Members of the Collegiate Conference of the South (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.
C 74
Average usability score of 6 fully scanned Collegiate Conference of the South member sites
8th
of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score
6 of 6
Collegiate conference of the south member sites fully scanned
D 68
Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How Collegiate Conference of the South usability scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 6 fully scanned Collegiate Conference of the South member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 6 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Collegiate Conference of the South average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 2 |
| 60 to 69 | 0 |
| 70 to 79 | 2 |
| 80 to 89 | 0 |
| 90 to 100 | 2 |
Collegiate Conference of the South by usability grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Collegiate Conference of the South: 6 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Collegiate Conference of the South | 33% (2) | 33% (2) | 33% (2) |
| All education sites | 11% (289) | 42% (1,124) | 47% (1,274) |
Top 3 Collegiate Conference of the South member sites by usability score
#1 in Collegiate Conference of the South · U.S. education rank 2
Agnes Scott College
A 93 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security C
- Usability A
- Readability A
#1 in Collegiate Conference of the South · U.S. education rank 2
Piedmont University
A 93 usability
- Accessibility B
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability A
- Readability A
#2 in Collegiate Conference of the South · U.S. education rank 13
Huntingdon College
C 75 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability B
- Security A
- Usability C
- Readability A
What each check means
- Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
- Open Graph image. The page has a preview image for social media cards. Shared links have no image on social media.
- Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
- First Contentful Paint (FCP). The page starts displaying content within 1.8 seconds. Users see blank screen and think site is broken.
- Time to First Byte (TTFB). The server sends the first byte of content within 0.8 seconds. Slow server delays everything on your page.
Every education site with one problem
- Education websites missing Open Graph tags: 1,859 of 2,687 fully scanned education sites (69%), with every site listed.
Collegiate Conference of the South members by usability score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
agnesscott.edu
Agnes Scott College U.S. rank 2 |
15 of 16 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
piedmont.edu
Piedmont University U.S. rank 2 |
15 of 16 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
huntingdon.edu
Huntingdon College U.S. rank 13 |
12 of 16 checks pass | C |
| 3 |
covenant.edu
Covenant College U.S. rank 14 |
11 of 15 checks pass | C |
| 4 |
belhaven.edu
Belhaven University U.S. rank 23 |
9 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 4 |
lagrange.edu
LaGrange College U.S. rank 23 |
9 of 16 checks pass | F |
About usability
Optimize content structure so users quickly find what they need.
Why it's important
Well-written pages help people understand laws, services, and procedures without confusion, reducing calls and office visits.
Risks
- Users cannot understand your information.
Guidance
What we use to grade usability:
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
- Google Search Central
- Web Vitals / Core Web Vitals
- Open Graph
Standards
- Page title
- Page description
- Viewport meta tag
- www resolution
- Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
- First Contentful Paint (FCP)
- Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
- Time to First Byte (TTFB)
- Open Graph site name
- Open Graph type
- Open Graph title
- Open Graph description
- Open Graph URL
- Open Graph image
- Open Graph image alt
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.