Showing Collegiate Conference of the South member sites. All education sites
Members of the Collegiate Conference of the South (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.
B 83
Average security score of 6 fully scanned Collegiate Conference of the South member sites
11th
of 96 conferences, ranked by average security score
6 of 6
Collegiate conference of the south member sites fully scanned
B 85
Average security score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How Collegiate Conference of the South security scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 6 fully scanned Collegiate Conference of the South member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 6 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Collegiate Conference of the South average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 0 |
| 60 to 69 | 0 |
| 70 to 79 | 3 |
| 80 to 89 | 2 |
| 90 to 100 | 1 |
Collegiate Conference of the South by security grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Collegiate Conference of the South: 6 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Collegiate Conference of the South | 17% (1) | 83% (5) | 0% (0) |
| All education sites | 19% (505) | 79% (2,113) | 3% (69) |
Top 3 Collegiate Conference of the South member sites by security score
#1 in Collegiate Conference of the South · U.S. education rank 1
Huntingdon College
A 100 security
- Accessibility A
- Botability B
- Security A
- Usability C
- Readability A
#2 in Collegiate Conference of the South · U.S. education rank 3
Covenant College
B 87 security
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability C
- Readability F
#2 in Collegiate Conference of the South · U.S. education rank 3
Piedmont University
B 87 security
- Accessibility B
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability A
- Readability A
What each check means
- X-Content-Type-Options. The site tells browsers not to guess the type of files it serves. Browsers might run dangerous files by mistake.
- Errors in the console. The page loads without JavaScript or network errors. Site may have hidden bugs that break features.
Collegiate Conference of the South members by security score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
huntingdon.edu
Huntingdon College U.S. rank 1 |
8 of 8 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
covenant.edu
Covenant College U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
piedmont.edu
Piedmont University U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
agnesscott.edu
Agnes Scott College U.S. rank 6 |
6 of 8 checks pass | C |
| 3 |
belhaven.edu
Belhaven University U.S. rank 6 |
6 of 8 checks pass | C |
| 3 |
lagrange.edu
LaGrange College U.S. rank 6 |
6 of 8 checks pass | C |
About security
Secure your site and protect users with proper security practices.
Why it's important
Strong defenses prevent hackers from stealing personal information and other confidential data.
Risks
- Hackers can steal private information from your site.
Guidance
What we use to grade security:
- CISA Website Security
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- CISA Cybersecurity Performance Goals
- RFC 9116
- OWASP Top 10
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
Standards
- Content security policy (CSP)
- HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)
- security.txt
- X-Content-Type-Options
- Errors in the console
- Clickjacking mitigation
- Paste preventing inputs
- Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure (HTTPS)
- Sponsored top-level domain (sTLD)
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.