Showing Conference of New England member sites. All education sites
Members of the Conference of New England (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.
D 68
Average usability score of 10 fully scanned Conference of New England member sites
14th
of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score
10 of 10
Conference of new england member sites fully scanned
D 68
Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How Conference of New England usability scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 10 fully scanned Conference of New England member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 10 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Conference of New England average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 1 |
| 40 to 49 | 2 |
| 50 to 59 | 2 |
| 60 to 69 | 0 |
| 70 to 79 | 0 |
| 80 to 89 | 2 |
| 90 to 100 | 3 |
Conference of New England by usability grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Conference of New England: 10 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conference of New England | 30% (3) | 20% (2) | 50% (5) |
| All education sites | 11% (289) | 42% (1,124) | 47% (1,274) |
Top 3 Conference of New England member sites by usability score
#1 in Conference of New England · U.S. education rank 2
Gordon College
A 93 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability A
- Readability A
#1 in Conference of New England · U.S. education rank 2
University of New England
A 93 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability A
- Readability F
#1 in Conference of New England · U.S. education rank 2
Western New England University
A 93 usability
- Accessibility B
- Botability A
- Security D
- Usability A
- Readability F
What each check means
- Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
- Open Graph type. The page declares its content type for social media cards. Social media shows wrong content type.
- Open Graph description. The page has a description for social media previews. Shared links have no description on social media.
- Open Graph image. The page has a preview image for social media cards. Shared links have no image on social media.
- Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
Every education site with one problem
- Education websites missing Open Graph tags: 1,859 of 2,687 fully scanned education sites (69%), with every site listed.
Conference of New England members by usability score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
gordon.edu
Gordon College U.S. rank 2 |
15 of 16 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
une.edu
University of New England U.S. rank 2 |
15 of 16 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
wne.edu
Western New England University U.S. rank 2 |
15 of 16 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
endicott.edu
Endicott College U.S. rank 4 |
14 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
nichols.edu
Nichols College U.S. rank 9 |
13 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 4 |
curry.edu
Curry College U.S. rank 23 |
9 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 5 |
hartford.edu
University of Hartford U.S. rank 25 |
8 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 6 |
rwu.edu
Roger Williams University U.S. rank 27 |
7 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 6 |
wit.edu
Wentworth Institute of Technology U.S. rank 27 |
7 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 7 |
suffolk.edu
Suffolk University U.S. rank 31 |
6 of 16 checks pass | F |
About usability
Optimize content structure so users quickly find what they need.
Why it's important
Well-written pages help people understand laws, services, and procedures without confusion, reducing calls and office visits.
Risks
- Users cannot understand your information.
Guidance
What we use to grade usability:
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
- Google Search Central
- Web Vitals / Core Web Vitals
- Open Graph
Standards
- Page title
- Page description
- Viewport meta tag
- www resolution
- Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
- First Contentful Paint (FCP)
- Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
- Time to First Byte (TTFB)
- Open Graph site name
- Open Graph type
- Open Graph title
- Open Graph description
- Open Graph URL
- Open Graph image
- Open Graph image alt
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.