Conference of New England: usability rankings

Usability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 10 Conference of New England member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 10
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Conference of New England (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

D 68

Average usability score of 10 fully scanned Conference of New England member sites

14th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score

10 of 10

Conference of new england member sites fully scanned

D 68

Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Conference of New England usability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 10 fully scanned Conference of New England member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 10 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Conference of New England average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Conference of New England usability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 391
40 to 492
50 to 592
60 to 690
70 to 790
80 to 892
90 to 1003

Conference of New England by usability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Conference of New England: 10 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Conference of New EnglandA (90 to 100): 30% (3 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 20% (2 sites)D to F (below 70): 50% (5 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 11% (289 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 42% (1,124 sites)D to F (below 70): 47% (1,274 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Conference of New England by usability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Conference of New England30% (3)20% (2)50% (5)
All education sites11% (289)42% (1,124)47% (1,274)

Top 3 Conference of New England member sites by usability score

#1 in Conference of New England · U.S. education rank 2

Gordon College

A 93 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#1 in Conference of New England · U.S. education rank 2

University of New England

A 93 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability F

#1 in Conference of New England · U.S. education rank 2

Western New England University

A 93 usability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security D
  • Usability A
  • Readability F

Most common usability failures among Conference of New England member sites

Share of the 10 fully scanned Conference of New England member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Open Graph image alt70% (7 of 10 sites)
  2. Open Graph type70% (7 of 10 sites)
  3. Open Graph description50% (5 of 10 sites)
  4. Open Graph image50% (5 of 10 sites)
  5. Open Graph site name50% (5 of 10 sites)
View the data table
Most common usability failures among Conference of New England member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Open Graph image alt70%7
Open Graph type70%7
Open Graph description50%5
Open Graph image50%5
Open Graph site name50%5

What each check means

  • Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
  • Open Graph type. The page declares its content type for social media cards. Social media shows wrong content type.
  • Open Graph description. The page has a description for social media previews. Shared links have no description on social media.
  • Open Graph image. The page has a preview image for social media cards. Shared links have no image on social media.
  • Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.

Every education site with one problem

Conference of New England members by usability score

Conference of New England members ranked by usability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 gordon.edu
Gordon College U.S. rank 2
15 of 16 checks pass A
1 une.edu
University of New England U.S. rank 2
15 of 16 checks pass A
1 wne.edu
Western New England University U.S. rank 2
15 of 16 checks pass A
2 endicott.edu
Endicott College U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
3 nichols.edu
Nichols College U.S. rank 9
13 of 16 checks pass B
4 curry.edu
Curry College U.S. rank 23
9 of 16 checks pass F
5 hartford.edu
University of Hartford U.S. rank 25
8 of 16 checks pass F
6 rwu.edu
Roger Williams University U.S. rank 27
7 of 16 checks pass F
6 wit.edu
Wentworth Institute of Technology U.S. rank 27
7 of 16 checks pass F
7 suffolk.edu
Suffolk University U.S. rank 31
6 of 16 checks pass F

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo