Conference of New England: security rankings

Security scores, grades, and the most common failures for 10 Conference of New England member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 10
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Showing Conference of New England member sites. All education sites

Members of the Conference of New England (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 85

Average security score of 10 fully scanned Conference of New England member sites

9th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average security score

10 of 10

Conference of new england member sites fully scanned

B 85

Average security score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Conference of New England security scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 10 fully scanned Conference of New England member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

  • Conference of New England average
  • All education average
View the data table
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 691
70 to 791
80 to 897
90 to 1001

Conference of New England by security grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Conference of New England: 10 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Conference of New England
  2. All education sites
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Conference of New England10% (1)80% (8)10% (1)
All education sites19% (505)79% (2,113)3% (69)

Top 3 Conference of New England member sites by security score

#1 in Conference of New England · U.S. education rank 1

Gordon College

A 100 security

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#2 in Conference of New England · U.S. education rank 3

Curry College

B 87 security

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability F
  • Readability F

#2 in Conference of New England · U.S. education rank 3

Endicott College

B 87 security

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability B
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

Most common security failures among Conference of New England member sites

Share of the 10 fully scanned Conference of New England member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to its standard and how to fix it.

  1. X-Content-Type-Options60%
  2. Errors in the console50%
  3. Security.txt10%
View the data table
CheckShare failingSites failing
X-Content-Type-Options60%6
Errors in the console50%5
Security.txt10%1

What each check means

  • X-Content-Type-Options. The site tells browsers not to guess the type of files it serves. Browsers might run dangerous files by mistake.
  • Errors in the console. The page loads without JavaScript or network errors. Site may have hidden bugs that break features.
  • Security.txt. The site has a security.txt file so researchers know how to report issues. Security researchers cannot report problems to you.

Conference of New England members by security score

Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 gordon.edu
Gordon College U.S. rank 1 		8 of 8 checks pass A
2 curry.edu
Curry College U.S. rank 3 		7 of 8 checks pass B
2 endicott.edu
Endicott College U.S. rank 3 		7 of 8 checks pass B
2 nichols.edu
Nichols College U.S. rank 3 		7 of 8 checks pass B
2 rwu.edu
Roger Williams University U.S. rank 3 		7 of 8 checks pass B
2 suffolk.edu
Suffolk University U.S. rank 3 		7 of 8 checks pass B
2 une.edu
University of New England U.S. rank 3 		7 of 8 checks pass B
2 wit.edu
Wentworth Institute of Technology U.S. rank 3 		7 of 8 checks pass B
3 hartford.edu
University of Hartford U.S. rank 6 		6 of 8 checks pass C
4 wne.edu
Western New England University U.S. rank 7 		6 of 9 checks pass D

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo