Showing Oklahoma county sites. All U.S. county sites
F 44
Average usability score of 51 fully scanned Oklahoma county sites
19th
of 49 states, ranked by average usability score
51 of 55
Sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 4, so they're listed without grades
F 48
U.S. county average usability score, 2467 fully scanned sites
Oklahoma's state site, oklahoma.gov, ranks 10th of 51 state sites with a B. State rankings.
How Oklahoma county usability scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 51 fully scanned Oklahoma county sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 51 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Oklahoma average
- U.S. county average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 7 |
| 30 to 39 | 15 |
| 40 to 49 | 5 |
| 50 to 59 | 19 |
| 60 to 69 | 1 |
| 70 to 79 | 0 |
| 80 to 89 | 3 |
| 90 to 100 | 1 |
Oklahoma counties by usability grade
Each county with a site on our list is colored by that site's grade. Select a county to open its report. The table lists every site.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
- Not fully scanned
- No site on our list
1 of the 55 sites on our list could not be matched to a county boundary and appear only in the table.
Oklahoma counties by usability grade, compared with all U.S. counties
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Oklahoma: 51 sites. U.S.: 2467 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma | 2% (1) | 6% (3) | 92% (47) |
| All U.S. counties | 2% (39) | 16% (403) | 82% (2,025) |
Top 3 Oklahoma county sites by usability score
#1 in Oklahoma · U.S. rank 2
Payne County, OK
A 93 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability B
- Security C
- Usability A
- Readability -
#2 in Oklahoma · U.S. rank 7
Garfield County, OK
B 80 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security C
- Usability B
- Readability F
#2 in Oklahoma · U.S. rank 7
Nowata County, OK
B 80 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability B
- Security B
- Usability B
- Readability A
What each check means
- Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
- Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
- Open Graph type. The page declares its content type for social media cards. Social media shows wrong content type.
- Open Graph description. The page has a description for social media previews. Shared links have no description on social media.
- Open Graph URL. The page has a canonical URL for social media sharing. Shared links may point to wrong page.
All Oklahoma county sites by usability score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
paynecounty.org
Payne County, OK U.S. rank 2 |
15 of 16 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
garfieldok.com
Garfield County, OK U.S. rank 7 |
12 of 15 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
nowataok.gov
Nowata County, OK U.S. rank 7 |
12 of 15 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
pawneecountyok.org
Pawnee County, OK U.S. rank 7 |
12 of 15 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
seminolecountyok.com
Seminole County, OK U.S. rank 13 |
10 of 15 checks pass | D |
| 4 |
beaver.okcounties.org
Beaver County, OK U.S. rank 20 |
8 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 4 |
beckham.okcounties.org
Beckham County, OK U.S. rank 20 |
8 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 4 |
cartercountyok.us
Carter County, OK U.S. rank 20 |
8 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 4 |
coal.okcounties.org
Coal County, OK U.S. rank 20 |
8 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 4 |
creekcountyonline.com
Creek County, OK U.S. rank 20 |
8 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 4 |
delaware.okcounties.org
Delaware County, OK U.S. rank 20 |
8 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 4 |
grant.okcounties.org
Grant County, OK U.S. rank 20 |
8 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 4 |
greer.okcounties.org
Greer County, OK U.S. rank 20 |
8 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 4 |
kingfisher.okcounties.org
Kingfisher County, OK U.S. rank 20 |
8 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 4 |
logancountyok.com
Logan County, OK U.S. rank 20 |
8 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 4 |
marshall.okcounties.org
Marshall County, OK U.S. rank 20 |
8 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 4 |
mayes.okcounties.org
Mayes County, OK U.S. rank 20 |
8 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 4 |
mccurtain.okcounties.org
McCurtain County, OK U.S. rank 20 |
8 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 4 |
osage.okcounties.org
Osage County, OK U.S. rank 20 |
8 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 4 |
pittsburg.okcounties.org
Pittsburg County, OK U.S. rank 20 |
8 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 4 |
pontotoc.okcounties.org
Pontotoc County, OK U.S. rank 20 |
8 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 4 |
sequoyah.okcounties.org
Sequoyah County, OK U.S. rank 20 |
8 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 4 |
texas.okcounties.org
Texas County, OK U.S. rank 20 |
8 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 4 |
washingtoncountyok.gov
Washington County, OK U.S. rank 20 |
8 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 5 |
lincolncountyok.org
Lincoln County, OK U.S. rank 21 |
7 of 15 checks pass | F |
| 5 |
ottawaok.gov
Ottawa County, OK U.S. rank 21 |
7 of 15 checks pass | F |
| 6 |
tillman.okcounties.org
Tillman County, OK U.S. rank 24 |
6 of 15 checks pass | F |
| 6 |
wagonercounty.ok.gov
Wagoner County, OK U.S. rank 24 |
6 of 15 checks pass | F |
| 6 |
woodward.okcounties.org
Woodward County, OK U.S. rank 24 |
6 of 15 checks pass | F |
| 7 |
clevelandcountyok.com
Cleveland County, OK U.S. rank 25 |
6 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 8 |
alfalfa.okcounties.org
Alfalfa County, OK U.S. rank 27 |
5 of 15 checks pass | F |
| 8 |
blaine.okcounties.org
Blaine County, OK U.S. rank 27 |
5 of 15 checks pass | F |
| 8 |
bryan.okcounties.org
Bryan County, OK U.S. rank 27 |
5 of 15 checks pass | F |
| 8 |
canadiancounty.org
Canadian County, OK U.S. rank 27 |
5 of 15 checks pass | F |
| 8 |
cherokee.okcounties.org
Cherokee County, OK U.S. rank 27 |
5 of 15 checks pass | F |
| 8 |
comanchecountyok.gov
Comanche County, OK U.S. rank 27 |
5 of 15 checks pass | F |
| 8 |
custer.okcounties.org
Custer County, OK U.S. rank 27 |
5 of 15 checks pass | F |
| 8 |
johnston.okcounties.org
Johnston County, OK U.S. rank 27 |
5 of 15 checks pass | F |
| 8 |
latimer.okcounties.org
Latimer County, OK U.S. rank 27 |
5 of 15 checks pass | F |
| 8 |
love.okcounties.org
Love County, OK U.S. rank 27 |
5 of 15 checks pass | F |
| 8 |
mcintosh.okcounties.org
McIntosh County, OK U.S. rank 27 |
5 of 15 checks pass | F |
| 8 |
muskogee.okcounties.org
Muskogee County, OK U.S. rank 27 |
5 of 15 checks pass | F |
| 8 |
noblecountyok.com
Noble County, OK U.S. rank 27 |
5 of 15 checks pass | F |
| 8 |
tulsacounty.org
Tulsa, OK U.S. rank 27 |
5 of 15 checks pass | F |
| 9 |
okmulgeeonline.com
Okmulgee County, OK U.S. rank 29 |
4 of 14 checks pass | F |
| 10 |
gradycountyok.com
Grady County, OK U.S. rank 30 |
4 of 15 checks pass | F |
| 10 |
courthouse.kay.ok.us
Kay County, OK U.S. rank 30 |
4 of 15 checks pass | F |
| 10 |
kiowacountyok.us
Kiowa County, OK U.S. rank 30 |
4 of 15 checks pass | F |
| 10 |
oklahomacounty.org
Oklahoma County, OK U.S. rank 30 |
4 of 15 checks pass | F |
| 10 |
pottawatomiecountyok.gov
Pottawatomie County, OK U.S. rank 30 |
4 of 15 checks pass | F |
| 10 |
rogerscounty.org
Rogers County, OK U.S. rank 30 |
4 of 15 checks pass | F |
|
jacksoncountyok.com
Jackson County, OK |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asked us not to. Status 998 | - | |
|
majorcountyok.org
Major County, OK |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because the page never finished loading in our browser. Status 994 | - | |
|
mcclain-co-ok.us
McClain County, OK |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 999 | - | |
|
countycourthouse.org
Washington County, OK |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because the page never finished loading in our browser. Status 994 | - |
About usability
Optimize content structure so users quickly find what they need.
Why it's important
Well-written pages help people understand laws, services, and procedures without confusion, reducing calls and office visits.
Risks
- Users cannot understand your information.
Guidance
What we use to grade usability:
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
- Google Search Central
- Web Vitals / Core Web Vitals
- Open Graph
Standards
- Page title
- Page description
- Viewport meta tag
- www resolution
- Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
- First Contentful Paint (FCP)
- Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
- Time to First Byte (TTFB)
- Open Graph site name
- Open Graph type
- Open Graph title
- Open Graph description
- Open Graph URL
- Open Graph image
- Open Graph image alt
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each county site on our county list in Oklahoma. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/7/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 4 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.