Oklahoma county websites: usability rankings

Name: Project ScanGov Oklahoma county websites: usability rankings
Creator: ScanGov
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Usability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 54 Oklahoma county government websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

Sites: 54
Last scan: 9/20/2026

Showing Oklahoma county sites. All U.S. county sites

F 43

Average usability score of 51 fully scanned Oklahoma county sites

19th

of 48 states, ranked by average usability score

51 of 54

Sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 3, so they're listed without grades

F 49

U.S. county average usability score, 2435 fully scanned sites

Oklahoma's state site, oklahoma.gov, ranks 12th of 51 state sites with a B. State rankings.

How Oklahoma county usability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 51 fully scanned Oklahoma county sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Oklahoma average
U.S. county average

View the data table

How Oklahoma county usability scores are distributed
Score range	Sites
0 to 9	0
10 to 19	0
20 to 29	7
30 to 39	13
40 to 49	18
50 to 59	8
60 to 69	1
70 to 79	2
80 to 89	2
90 to 100	0

Oklahoma counties by usability grade, compared with all U.S. counties

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Oklahoma: 51 sites. U.S.: 2435 sites.

OklahomaB to C (70 to 89): 8% (4 sites)D to F (below 70): 92% (47 sites)
All U.S. countiesA (90 to 100): 1% (24 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 18% (436 sites)D to F (below 70): 81% (1,975 sites)

A (90 to 100)
B to C (70 to 89)
D to F (below 70)

View the data table

Oklahoma counties by usability grade, compared with all U.S. counties
Group	A (90 to 100)	B to C (70 to 89)	D to F (below 70)
Oklahoma	0% (0)	8% (4)	92% (47)
All U.S. counties	1% (24)	18% (436)	81% (1,975)

Top 3 Oklahoma county sites by usability score

#1 in Oklahoma · U.S. rank 6

Nowata County, OK

B 82 usability

Accessibility A
Botability B
Security A
Usability B

#1 in Oklahoma · U.S. rank 6

Pawnee County, OK

B 82 usability

Accessibility A
Botability A
Security C
Usability B

#2 in Oklahoma · U.S. rank 8

Payne County, OK

C 76 usability

Accessibility A
Botability B
Security C
Usability C

Most common usability failures among Oklahoma county sites

Share of the 51 fully scanned Oklahoma county sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to its standard and how to fix it.

Open Graph image alt100% (51 of 51 sites)
Open Graph site name92% (47 of 51 sites)
Open Graph type92% (47 of 51 sites)
Open Graph description90% (46 of 51 sites)
Open Graph URL90% (46 of 51 sites)

View the data table

Most common usability failures among Oklahoma county sites
Check	Share failing	Sites failing
Open Graph image alt	100%	51
Open Graph site name	92%	47
Open Graph type	92%	47
Open Graph description	90%	46
Open Graph URL	90%	46

What each check means

Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
Open Graph type. The page declares its content type for social media cards. Social media shows wrong content type.
Open Graph description. The page has a description for social media previews. Shared links have no description on social media.
Open Graph URL. The page has a canonical URL for social media sharing. Shared links may point to wrong page.

All Oklahoma county sites by usability score

Oklahoma county sites ranked by usability score
Rank	Site	Checks passed	Grade
1	nowataok.gov Nowata County, OK U.S. rank 6	14 of 17 checks pass	B
1	pawneecountyok.org Pawnee County, OK U.S. rank 6	14 of 17 checks pass	B
2	paynecounty.org Payne County, OK U.S. rank 8	13 of 17 checks pass	C
3	garfieldok.com Garfield County, OK U.S. rank 10	12 of 17 checks pass	C
4	seminolecountyok.com Seminole County, OK U.S. rank 12	11 of 17 checks pass	D
5	cartercountyok.us Carter County, OK U.S. rank 16	9 of 17 checks pass	F
5	delaware.okcounties.org Delaware County, OK U.S. rank 16	9 of 17 checks pass	F
5	marshall.okcounties.org Marshall County, OK U.S. rank 16	9 of 17 checks pass	F
5	mayes.okcounties.org Mayes County, OK U.S. rank 16	9 of 17 checks pass	F
5	mccurtain.okcounties.org McCurtain County, OK U.S. rank 16	9 of 17 checks pass	F
5	osage.okcounties.org Osage County, OK U.S. rank 16	9 of 17 checks pass	F
5	pontotoc.okcounties.org Pontotoc County, OK U.S. rank 16	9 of 17 checks pass	F
5	washingtoncountyok.gov Washington County, OK U.S. rank 16	9 of 17 checks pass	F
6	beckham.okcounties.org Beckham County, OK U.S. rank 18	8 of 17 checks pass	F
6	creekcountyonline.com Creek County, OK U.S. rank 18	8 of 17 checks pass	F
6	love.okcounties.org Love County, OK U.S. rank 18	8 of 17 checks pass	F
6	pittsburg.okcounties.org Pittsburg County, OK U.S. rank 18	8 of 17 checks pass	F
6	sequoyah.okcounties.org Sequoyah County, OK U.S. rank 18	8 of 17 checks pass	F
7	lincolncountyok.org Lincoln County, OK U.S. rank 19	7 of 16 checks pass	F
7	ottawaok.gov Ottawa County, OK U.S. rank 19	7 of 16 checks pass	F
8	beaver.okcounties.org Beaver County, OK U.S. rank 20	7 of 17 checks pass	F
8	clevelandcountyok.com Cleveland County, OK U.S. rank 20	7 of 17 checks pass	F
8	custer.okcounties.org Custer County, OK U.S. rank 20	7 of 17 checks pass	F
8	grant.okcounties.org Grant County, OK U.S. rank 20	7 of 17 checks pass	F
8	kingfisher.okcounties.org Kingfisher County, OK U.S. rank 20	7 of 17 checks pass	F
8	mcintosh.okcounties.org McIntosh County, OK U.S. rank 20	7 of 17 checks pass	F
8	noblecountyok.com Noble County, OK U.S. rank 20	7 of 17 checks pass	F
8	texas.okcounties.org Texas County, OK U.S. rank 20	7 of 17 checks pass	F
8	tillman.okcounties.org Tillman County, OK U.S. rank 20	7 of 17 checks pass	F
8	wagonercounty.ok.gov Wagoner County, OK U.S. rank 20	7 of 17 checks pass	F
8	woodward.okcounties.org Woodward County, OK U.S. rank 20	7 of 17 checks pass	F
9	alfalfa.okcounties.org Alfalfa County, OK U.S. rank 22	6 of 17 checks pass	F
9	blaine.okcounties.org Blaine County, OK U.S. rank 22	6 of 17 checks pass	F
9	canadiancounty.org Canadian County, OK U.S. rank 22	6 of 17 checks pass	F
9	cherokee.okcounties.org Cherokee County, OK U.S. rank 22	6 of 17 checks pass	F
9	coal.okcounties.org Coal County, OK U.S. rank 22	6 of 17 checks pass	F
9	greer.okcounties.org Greer County, OK U.S. rank 22	6 of 17 checks pass	F
9	johnston.okcounties.org Johnston County, OK U.S. rank 22	6 of 17 checks pass	F
9	kiowacountyok.us Kiowa County, OK U.S. rank 22	6 of 17 checks pass	F
9	latimer.okcounties.org Latimer County, OK U.S. rank 22	6 of 17 checks pass	F
9	muskogee.okcounties.org Muskogee County, OK U.S. rank 22	6 of 17 checks pass	F
9	rogerscounty.org Rogers County, OK U.S. rank 22	6 of 17 checks pass	F
9	tulsacounty.org Tulsa, OK U.S. rank 22	6 of 17 checks pass	F
10	oklahomacounty.org Oklahoma County, OK U.S. rank 23	5 of 16 checks pass	F
11	bryan.okcounties.org Bryan County, OK U.S. rank 24	5 of 17 checks pass	F
11	comanchecountyok.gov Comanche County, OK U.S. rank 24	5 of 17 checks pass	F
11	courthouse.kay.ok.us Kay County, OK U.S. rank 24	5 of 17 checks pass	F
11	logancountyok.com Logan County, OK U.S. rank 24	5 of 17 checks pass	F
11	okmulgeeonline.com Okmulgee County, OK U.S. rank 24	5 of 17 checks pass	F
11	pottawatomiecountyok.gov Pottawatomie County, OK U.S. rank 24	5 of 17 checks pass	F
12	gradycountyok.com Grady County, OK U.S. rank 26	4 of 17 checks pass	F
	jacksoncountyok.com Jackson County, OK	Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asked us not to. Status 998	-
	majorcountyok.org Major County, OK	Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996	-
	mcclain-co-ok.us McClain County, OK	Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996	-

Rank · Status · Grade

About usability

Optimize content structure so users quickly find what they need.

Why it's important

Well-written pages help people understand laws, services, and procedures without confusion, reducing calls and office visits.

Risks

Users cannot understand your information.

Guidance

What we use to grade usability:

Standards

Grades/scores

Usability grades/scores on Project ScanGov

ScanGov

How ScanGov supports usability

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each county government site on our county list in Oklahoma. Scores come from the checks listed on standards.scangov.org. Sites were scanned between 8/17/2026 and 9/18/2026; each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage returned successfully and sent the scanner its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We weren't able to fully scan 3 sites because they did not respond, blocked the scanner, or returned no page content. They appear in the table without grades, each with its scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale, and rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, including every county's raw results, is published in the ScanGov data repository.