Showing Oklahoma county sites. All U.S. county sites
A 91
Average accessibility score of 51 fully scanned Oklahoma county sites
5th
of 49 states, ranked by average accessibility score
51 of 55
Sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 4, so they're listed without grades
B 88
U.S. county average accessibility score, 2467 fully scanned sites
Oklahoma's state site, oklahoma.gov, ranks 10th of 51 state sites with a B. State rankings.
How Oklahoma county accessibility scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 51 fully scanned Oklahoma county sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 51 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Oklahoma average
- U.S. county average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 1 |
| 60 to 69 | 0 |
| 70 to 79 | 2 |
| 80 to 89 | 7 |
| 90 to 100 | 41 |
Oklahoma counties by accessibility grade
Each county with a site on our list is colored by that site's grade. Select a county to open its report. The table lists every site.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
- Not fully scanned
- No site on our list
1 of the 55 sites on our list could not be matched to a county boundary and appear only in the table.
Oklahoma counties by accessibility grade, compared with all U.S. counties
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Oklahoma: 51 sites. U.S.: 2467 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma | 80% (41) | 18% (9) | 2% (1) |
| All U.S. counties | 49% (1,201) | 49% (1,197) | 3% (69) |
Top 3 Oklahoma county sites by accessibility score
#1 in Oklahoma · U.S. rank 3
Beaver County, OK
A 96 accessibility
- Accessibility A
- Botability D
- Security B
- Usability F
- Readability -
#1 in Oklahoma · U.S. rank 3
Beckham County, OK
A 96 accessibility
- Accessibility A
- Botability D
- Security B
- Usability F
- Readability -
#1 in Oklahoma · U.S. rank 3
Cherokee County, OK
A 96 accessibility
- Accessibility A
- Botability D
- Security C
- Usability F
- Readability F
What each check means
- Document has a main landmark. The page has exactly one main content area so screen readers can navigate to it. Screen reader users cannot skip directly to main content.
- Td elements in a large table have one or more table headers. Each cell in a large table is linked to a header so screen readers can navigate it. Screen reader users cannot understand data in large tables.
- Links have a discernible name. Links have unique, descriptive text so users know where they go. Screen reader users cannot identify or interact with elements.
- Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] have all required children. Interactive groups contain all the child elements they need to work correctly. Screen readers cannot navigate grouped elements like menus or lists.
- [aria-hidden="true"] elements do not contain focusable descendents. Interactive elements are not hidden from screen reader users. Keyboard users can focus elements that screen readers cannot announce.
All Oklahoma county sites by accessibility score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
beaver.okcounties.org
Beaver County, OK U.S. rank 3 |
27 of 28 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
beckham.okcounties.org
Beckham County, OK U.S. rank 3 |
28 of 29 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
cherokee.okcounties.org
Cherokee County, OK U.S. rank 3 |
28 of 29 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
creekcountyonline.com
Creek County, OK U.S. rank 3 |
30 of 31 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
garfieldok.com
Garfield County, OK U.S. rank 3 |
26 of 27 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
grant.okcounties.org
Grant County, OK U.S. rank 3 |
27 of 28 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
kingfisher.okcounties.org
Kingfisher County, OK U.S. rank 3 |
27 of 28 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
marshall.okcounties.org
Marshall County, OK U.S. rank 3 |
29 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
mcintosh.okcounties.org
McIntosh County, OK U.S. rank 3 |
28 of 29 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
pontotoc.okcounties.org
Pontotoc County, OK U.S. rank 3 |
28 of 29 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
pawneecountyok.org
Pawnee County, OK U.S. rank 4 |
23 of 24 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
alfalfa.okcounties.org
Alfalfa County, OK U.S. rank 6 |
28 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
blaine.okcounties.org
Blaine County, OK U.S. rank 6 |
28 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
bryan.okcounties.org
Bryan County, OK U.S. rank 6 |
28 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
coal.okcounties.org
Coal County, OK U.S. rank 6 |
28 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
custer.okcounties.org
Custer County, OK U.S. rank 6 |
28 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
delaware.okcounties.org
Delaware County, OK U.S. rank 6 |
28 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
greer.okcounties.org
Greer County, OK U.S. rank 6 |
28 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
johnston.okcounties.org
Johnston County, OK U.S. rank 6 |
28 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
latimer.okcounties.org
Latimer County, OK U.S. rank 6 |
28 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
lincolncountyok.org
Lincoln County, OK U.S. rank 6 |
28 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
love.okcounties.org
Love County, OK U.S. rank 6 |
28 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
mayes.okcounties.org
Mayes County, OK U.S. rank 6 |
28 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
mccurtain.okcounties.org
McCurtain County, OK U.S. rank 6 |
28 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
muskogee.okcounties.org
Muskogee County, OK U.S. rank 6 |
28 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
nowataok.gov
Nowata County, OK U.S. rank 6 |
30 of 32 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
osage.okcounties.org
Osage County, OK U.S. rank 6 |
28 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
ottawaok.gov
Ottawa County, OK U.S. rank 6 |
28 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
paynecounty.org
Payne County, OK U.S. rank 6 |
28 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
sequoyah.okcounties.org
Sequoyah County, OK U.S. rank 6 |
28 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
texas.okcounties.org
Texas County, OK U.S. rank 6 |
29 of 31 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
tillman.okcounties.org
Tillman County, OK U.S. rank 6 |
29 of 31 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
washingtoncountyok.gov
Washington County, OK U.S. rank 6 |
29 of 31 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
woodward.okcounties.org
Woodward County, OK U.S. rank 6 |
28 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 4 |
pittsburg.okcounties.org
Pittsburg County, OK U.S. rank 7 |
24 of 26 checks pass | A |
| 5 |
clevelandcountyok.com
Cleveland County, OK U.S. rank 8 |
33 of 36 checks pass | A |
| 5 |
gradycountyok.com
Grady County, OK U.S. rank 8 |
32 of 35 checks pass | A |
| 5 |
pottawatomiecountyok.gov
Pottawatomie County, OK U.S. rank 8 |
33 of 36 checks pass | A |
| 5 |
rogerscounty.org
Rogers County, OK U.S. rank 8 |
32 of 35 checks pass | A |
| 5 |
tulsacounty.org
Tulsa, OK U.S. rank 8 |
22 of 24 checks pass | A |
| 6 |
logancountyok.com
Logan County, OK U.S. rank 9 |
28 of 31 checks pass | A |
| 7 |
canadiancounty.org
Canadian County, OK U.S. rank 11 |
31 of 35 checks pass | B |
| 7 |
courthouse.kay.ok.us
Kay County, OK U.S. rank 11 |
32 of 36 checks pass | B |
| 7 |
okmulgeeonline.com
Okmulgee County, OK U.S. rank 11 |
31 of 35 checks pass | B |
| 7 |
wagonercounty.ok.gov
Wagoner County, OK U.S. rank 11 |
32 of 36 checks pass | B |
| 8 |
comanchecountyok.gov
Comanche County, OK U.S. rank 12 |
27 of 31 checks pass | B |
| 9 |
oklahomacounty.org
Oklahoma County, OK U.S. rank 19 |
20 of 25 checks pass | B |
| 9 |
seminolecountyok.com
Seminole County, OK U.S. rank 19 |
12 of 15 checks pass | B |
| 10 |
cartercountyok.us
Carter County, OK U.S. rank 23 |
23 of 30 checks pass | C |
| 11 |
kiowacountyok.us
Kiowa County, OK U.S. rank 27 |
21 of 29 checks pass | C |
| 12 |
noblecountyok.com
Noble County, OK U.S. rank 44 |
10 of 19 checks pass | F |
|
jacksoncountyok.com
Jackson County, OK |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asked us not to. Status 998 | - | |
|
majorcountyok.org
Major County, OK |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because the page never finished loading in our browser. Status 994 | - | |
|
mcclain-co-ok.us
McClain County, OK |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 999 | - | |
|
countycourthouse.org
Washington County, OK |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because the page never finished loading in our browser. Status 994 | - |
About accessibility
Meet WCAG standards so every type of user can use your website.
Why it's important
People with disabilities need equal access to information and services online.
Risks
- People with disabilities cannot use your site.
Guidance
What we use to grade accessibility:
Standards
- [accesskey] values are unique
- [aria-*] attributes match their roles
- Uses ARIA roles only on compatible elements
- button, link, and menuitem elements have accessible names
- ARIA attributes are used as specified for the element's role
- Deprecated ARIA roles were not used
- Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" have accessible names
- [aria-hidden="true"] is not present on the document <body>
- [aria-hidden="true"] elements do not contain focusable descendents
- ARIA input fields have accessible names
- ARIA meter elements have accessible names
- ARIA progressbar elements have accessible names
- Elements use only permitted ARIA attributes
- [role]s have all required [aria-*] attributes
- Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] have all required children
- [role]s are contained by their required parent element
- [role] values are valid
- Elements with the role=text attribute do not have focusable descendents
- ARIA toggle fields have accessible names
- ARIA tooltip elements have accessible names
- ARIA treeitem elements have accessible names
- [aria-*] attributes have valid values
- [aria-*] attributes are valid and not misspelled
- Buttons have an accessible name
- The page contains a heading, skip link, or landmark region
- Background and foreground colors have a sufficient contrast ratio
- <dl>'s contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements
- Definition list items are wrapped in <dl> elements
- Document has a <title> element
- ARIA IDs are unique
- No form fields have multiple labels
- <frame> or <iframe> elements have a title
- Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order
- <html> element has a [lang] attribute
- <html> element has a valid value for its [lang] attribute
- <html> element has an [xml:lang] attribute with the same base language as the [lang] attribute
- Image elements have [alt] attributes
- Image elements do not have [alt] attributes that are redundant text
- Input buttons have discernible text
- <input type="image"> elements have [alt] text
- Form elements have associated labels
- Links are distinguishable without relying on color
- Links have a discernible name
- Lists contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>)
- List items (<li>) are contained within <ul>, <ol> or <menu> parent elements
- The document does not use <meta http-equiv="refresh">
- [user-scalable="no"] is not used in the <meta name="viewport"> element and the [maximum-scale] attribute is not less than 5
- <object> elements have alternate text
- Select elements have associated label elements
- Skip links are focusable
- No element has a [tabindex] value greater than 0
- Tables have different content in the summary attribute and <caption>
- Touch targets have sufficient size and spacing
- Cells in a <table> element that use the [headers] attribute refer to table cells within the same table
- <th> elements and elements with [role="columnheader"/"rowheader"] have data cells they describe
- [lang] attributes have a valid value
- <video> elements contain a <track> element with [kind="captions"]
- All heading elements contain content
- Identical links have the same purpose
- Document has a main landmark
- Elements with visible text labels have matching accessible names
- Tables use <caption> instead of cells with the [colspan] attribute to indicate a caption
- <td> elements in a large <table> have one or more table headers
- Image aspect ratio
- Valid doctype
- Character encoding
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each county site on our county list in Oklahoma. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/7/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 4 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.