County websites ranked by digital experience

Project ScanGov rankings of U.S. county government websites by overall digital experience grade, with accessibility, botability, security, usability, and readability scores and a page for every state.

  • Sites: 2842
  • Last scan: 10/9/2026
Site rankings
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
21 madisoncountymt.gov
Madison County, MT
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 co.hunterdon.nj.us
Hunterdon County, NJ
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 effinghamcounty.org
Effingham County, GA
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
21 lancaster.ne.gov
Lancaster County, NE
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 crosscountyar.org
Cross County, AR
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
21 gemcounty.org
Gem County, ID
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 klamathcounty.org
Klamath County, OR
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
21 polktx.gov
Polk County, TX
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 co.glasscock.tx.us
Glasscock County, TX
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 plaqueminesparish.gov
Plaquemines Parish, LA
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 kiowacountyks.gov
Kiowa County, KS
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 hendersoncountytn.gov
Henderson County, TN
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade -
C
21 clermontcountyohio.gov
Clermont County, OH
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 christiancountyky.gov
Christian County, KY
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
21 camdencountync.gov
Camden County, NC
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 wilkescounty.net
Wilkes County, NC
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 co.portage.wi.gov
Portage County, WI
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 seviercountytn.gov
Sevier County, TN
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
21 crawfordcounty.iowa.gov
Crawford County, IA
  • Accessibility grade C
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
C
21 unionnm.us
Union County, NM
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 browncountymn.gov
Brown County, MN
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 lyoncountyks.gov
Lyon County, KS
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 winnebagocountyiowa.gov
Winnebago County, IA
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
C
21 marshallcountyky.gov
Marshall County, KY
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 grundycountyiowa.gov
Grundy County, IA
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 sierracounty.ca.gov
Sierra County, CA
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 stjamesla.com
St. James Parish, LA
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 adaircounty.iowa.gov
Adair County, IA
  • Accessibility grade C
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
C
21 sussexcountyva.gov
Sussex County, VA
  • Accessibility grade C
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
C
21 hamiltoncounty.in.gov
Hamilton County, IN
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 binghamid.gov
Bingham County, ID
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 yuba.gov
Yuba County, CA
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 franklincountyflorida.com
Franklin County, FL
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
21 peoriacounty.gov
Peoria County, IL
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 clearfieldcountypa.gov
Clearfield County, PA
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 moorecountync.gov
Moore County, NC
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 clintoncounty-ia.gov
Clinton County, IA
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
C
21 grantcountynd.com
Grant County, ND
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
C
21 richland.org
Richland County, MT
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade -
C
21 pontotoc.okcounties.org
Pontotoc County, OK
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 alexandercountync.gov
Alexander County, NC
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 paulding.gov
Paulding County, GA
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 kennebec.gov
Kennebec County, ME
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 co.jackson.ms.us
Jackson County, MS
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 hamiltoncountytx.gov
Hamilton County, TX
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 plymouthcountyma.gov
Plymouth County, MA
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 co.midland.tx.us
Midland County, TX
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
21 clark-co.id.gov
Clark County, ID
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 kentcounty.com
Kent County, MD
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
21 yakimacounty.us
Yakima County, WA
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 clarkecountyms.gov
Clarke County, MS
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 co.lipscomb.tx.us
Lipscomb County, TX
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 meadeky.gov
Meade County, KY
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 co.door.wi.gov
Door County, WI
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 waynegov.com
Wayne County, NC
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
21 hancockcounty.ms.gov
Hancock County, MS
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 hallcountyne.gov
Hall County, NE
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 douglascountyga.gov
Douglas County, GA
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 conwaycountyar.com
Conway County, AR
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
C
21 franklincountywa.gov
Franklin County, WA
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 wagonercounty.ok.gov
Wagoner County, OK
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
21 co.valencia.nm.us
Valencia County, NM
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 houghtoncounty.net
Houghton County, MI
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
21 iowacounty.iowa.gov
Iowa County, IA
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
C
21 co.jefferson-davis.ms.us
Jefferson Davis County, MS
  • Accessibility grade C
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
C
21 evanscounty.org
Evans County, GA
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 nevadacountyca.gov
Nevada County, CA
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 boydcountyky.gov
Boyd County, KY
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 unioncountyohio.gov
Union County, OH
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
21 co.tuscarawas.oh.us
Tuscarawas County, OH
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 summitcountyco.gov
Summit County, CO
  • Accessibility grade C
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
C
21 ouraycountyco.gov
Ouray County, CO
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 co.strafford.nh.us
Strafford County, NH
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
21 lasallecountyil.gov
LaSalle County, IL
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 madisonco.virginia.gov
Madison County, VA
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 desotobocc.com
DeSoto County, FL
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 leecountyil.com
Lee County, IL
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 dconc.gov
Durham County, NC
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 wcut.maine.gov
Washington County Unorganized Territories, ME
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
21 haywoodcountync.gov
Haywood County, NC
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
21 snohomishcountywa.gov
Snohomish County, WA
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
21 washoecounty.gov
Washoe County, NV
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 gloucestercountynj.gov
Gloucester County, NJ
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 leflorecounty.ms
Leflore County, MS
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
C
21 lanecountyor.gov
Lane County, OR
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
21 cavaliercounty.us
Cavalier County, ND
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
22 yorkcounty.gov
York County, VA
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
22 calaverasgov.us
Calaveras County, CA
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
22 lesueurcounty.gov
Le Sueur County, MN
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
22 wasecacounty.gov
Waseca County, MN
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
22 douglascountywa.gov
Douglas County, WA
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
22 wrightcountymn.gov
Wright County, MN
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
22 ottawaok.gov
Ottawa County, OK
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
22 madisoncountyid.gov
Madison County, ID
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade F
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
22 sunflowercounty.ms.gov
Sunflower County, MS
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
22 hidalgocounty.us
Hidalgo County, TX
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
22 willacy.gov
Willacy County, TX
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
22 watonwancountymn.gov
Watonwan County, MN
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
22 lotwcounty.gov
Lake of the Woods County, MN
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
22 orangecountyny.gov
Orange County, NY
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C

Page 11 of 29