County websites ranked by digital experience

Project ScanGov rankings of U.S. county government websites by overall digital experience grade, with accessibility, botability, security, usability, and readability scores and a page for every state.

  • Sites: 2842
  • Last scan: 10/9/2026
Site rankings
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
22 baldwincountyga.com
Baldwin County, GA
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
22 newcastlede.gov
New Castle County, DE
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
22 burnettcountywi.gov
Burnett County, WI
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
22 nyecountynv.gov
Nye County, NV
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
22 randolphcountync.gov
Randolph County, NC
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
22 co.adams.in.us
Adams County, IN
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
22 sanjuancountyut.gov
San Juan County, UT
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
22 co.howard.tx.us
Howard County, TX
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
22 knoxcounty.org
Knox County, TN
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
22 deltacountyco.gov
Delta County, CO
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
22 desotocountyms.gov
DeSoto County, MS
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
22 mecknc.gov
Mecklenburg County, NC
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
C
22 pasquotankcountync.org
Pasquotank County, NC
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade D
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
C
22 prestoncountywv.gov
Preston County, WV
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
22 co.walworth.wi.us
Walworth County, WI
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
22 columbusga.gov
Muscogee County, GA
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
22 jacksoncounty-il.gov
Jackson County, IL
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
22 montourcounty.gov
Montour County, PA
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
22 rosebudcountymt.gov
Rosebud County, MT
  • Accessibility grade C
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
C
22 creekcountyonline.com
Creek County, OK
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
22 sibleycounty.gov
Sibley County, MN
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
22 martin.fl.us
Martin County, FL
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade D
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
22 yamhillcounty.gov
Yamhill County, OR
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 buttecounty.net
Butte County, CA
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
23 co.atascosa.tx.us
Atascosa County, TX
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
23 co.erath.tx.us
Erath County, TX
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 co.grayson.tx.us
Grayson County, TX
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 madisoncounty.ny.gov
Madison County, NY
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
23 co.rockbridge.va.us
Rockbridge County, VA
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 kentoncountyky.gov
Kenton County, KY
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 daviecountync.gov
Davie County, NC
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 burlingtoncountynj.gov
Burlington County, NJ
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
23 elliscountytx.gov
Ellis County, TX
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 crcogct.gov
Capitol Planning Region, CT
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
23 kenoshacountywi.gov
Kenosha County, WI
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
23 russellcountyva.us
Russell County, VA
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 morrowcountyor.gov
Morrow County, OR
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 sawyercounty.gov
Sawyer County, WI
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 gtcountysc.gov
Georgetown County, SC
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 coshoctoncounty.net
Coshocton County, OH
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
23 kcmn.us
Kandiyohi County, MN
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
C
23 roseaucountymn.gov
Roseau County, MN
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 crookcountyor.gov
Crook County, OR
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
23 banderacounty.gov
Bandera County, TX
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade F
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 co.anson.nc.us
Anson County, NC
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 lakecountymn.gov
Lake County, MN
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
23 sequoyah.okcounties.org
Sequoyah County, OK
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 isanticountymn.gov
Isanti County, MN
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
23 mijackson.org
Jackson County, MI
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 lassencounty.gov
Lassen County, CA
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
23 napacounty.gov
Napa County, CA
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 mariposacounty.gov
Mariposa County, CA
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
23 polkcountyor.gov
Polk County, OR
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 pottawatomiecountyok.gov
Pottawatomie County, OK
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
23 lancastercountysc.gov
Lancaster County, SC
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 duplinnc.gov
Duplin County, NC
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 whitfieldcountyga.com
Whitfield County, GA
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
23 franklincountyidaho.org
Franklin County, ID
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade F
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 washingtoncountytn.org
Washington County, TN
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 johnsoncounty.ne.gov
Johnson County, NE
  • Accessibility grade C
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
C
23 waynecountypa.gov
Wayne County, PA
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
23 clatsopcounty.gov
Clatsop County, OR
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
23 thurstoncountywa.gov
Thurston County, WA
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
23 co.shelby.tx.us
Shelby County, TX
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 neoshocountyks.org
Neosho County, KS
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 co.sanders.mt.us
Sanders County, MT
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 hancockcountytn.com
Hancock County, TN
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
23 co.platte.mo.us
Platte County, MO
  • Accessibility grade C
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
C
23 co.hall.tx.us
Hall County, TX
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
23 bankscountyga.org
Banks County, GA
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 lincolncountyok.org
Lincoln County, OK
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
23 co.lynn.tx.us
Lynn County, TX
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 schleichercounty.gov
Schleicher County, TX
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
23 stearnscountymn.gov
Stearns County, MN
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade -
C
23 prco.mt.gov
Powder River County, MT
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 co.patrick.va.us
Patrick County, VA
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 mayes.okcounties.org
Mayes County, OK
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
23 lawrencecounty.ky.gov
Lawrence County, KY
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 dupagecounty.gov
DuPage County, IL
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
23 bigstonecounty.gov
Big Stone County, MN
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
23 co.reagan.tx.us
Reagan County, TX
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
23 coconino.az.gov
Coconino County, AZ
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
23 casscountymn.gov
Cass County, MN
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 montgomerytn.gov
Montgomery County, TN
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade F
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
C
23 bannercountyne.gov
Banner County, NE
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
23 mccurtain.okcounties.org
McCurtain County, OK
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
23 madisoncounty.iowa.gov
Madison County, IA
  • Accessibility grade C
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade -
C
23 co.pickens.sc.us
Pickens County, SC
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 cumberlandcoil.gov
Cumberland County, IL
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 sumtercountyfl.gov
Sumter County, FL
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
23 mercercountyil.org
Mercer County, IL
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade F
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 canadiancounty.org
Canadian County, OK
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 winstoncountyms.org
Winston County, MS
  • Accessibility grade C
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
C
23 charltoncountyga.us
Charlton County, GA
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 benewahcountyid.gov
Benewah County, ID
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
23 co.gray.tx.us
Gray County, TX
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
23 gradycountyga.gov
Grady County, GA
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
23 blueearthcountymn.gov
Blue Earth County, MN
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
23 daviess.org
Daviess County, IN
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 burnetcountytexas.org
Burnet County, TX
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C

Page 13 of 29