Showing University of Minnesota sites. All education sites
Campuses of the University of Minnesota. The system office site is listed but not averaged, since it is not a campus homepage.
A 92
Average botability score of 5 fully scanned University of Minnesota campus sites
6th
of 57 systems, ranked by average botability score
5 of 5
University of minnesota campus sites fully scanned
B 89
Average botability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How University of Minnesota botability scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 5 fully scanned University of Minnesota campus sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 5 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- University of Minnesota average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 0 |
| 60 to 69 | 0 |
| 70 to 79 | 0 |
| 80 to 89 | 0 |
| 90 to 100 | 5 |
University of Minnesota by botability grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. University of Minnesota: 5 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| University of Minnesota | 100% (5) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
| All education sites | 71% (1,899) | 25% (660) | 5% (128) |
Top 3 University of Minnesota campus sites by botability score
#1 in University of Minnesota · U.S. education rank 1
University of Minnesota-Duluth
A 100 botability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability A
- Readability F
#2 in University of Minnesota · U.S. education rank 2
University of Minnesota-Crookston
A 90 botability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability D
- Readability F
#2 in University of Minnesota · U.S. education rank 2
University of Minnesota-Morris
A 90 botability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability B
- Readability A
What each check means
- Sitemap in robots.txt. The robots.txt file links to the sitemap. Search engines take longer to find your pages.
Every education site with one problem
- Education websites with sitemap problems: 1,031 of 2,650 fully scanned education sites (39%), with every site listed.
- Education websites with robots.txt problems: 95 of 2,629 fully scanned education sites (4%), with every site listed.
- Education websites that need JavaScript to show their content: 68 of 2,687 fully scanned education sites (3%), with every site listed.
University of Minnesota campuses by botability score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
d.umn.edu
University of Minnesota-Duluth U.S. rank 1 |
11 of 11 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
crk.umn.edu
University of Minnesota-Crookston U.S. rank 2 |
10 of 11 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
morris.umn.edu
University of Minnesota-Morris U.S. rank 2 |
10 of 11 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
r.umn.edu
University of Minnesota-Rochester U.S. rank 2 |
10 of 11 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
twin-cities.umn.edu
University of Minnesota-Twin Cities U.S. rank 2 |
10 of 11 checks pass | A |
About botability
Help AI and search engines discover, crawl, and index your website.
Why it's important
Smart technology can better process and share public information, making services faster and more efficient for users.
Risks
- AI tools cannot find or understand your content.
Guidance
What we use to grade botability:
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- The Web Robots Pages
- Schema.org
- sitemaps.org
- Google Search Central
Standards
- Crawlable
- Content available in document
- GovernmentOrganization Schema.org type
- Sitemap status
- Sitemap XML
- Robots valid
- Robots allowed
- Sitemap in robots.txt
- Canonical
- Link text
- hreflang
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/1/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.