Showing University of Minnesota sites. All education sites
Campuses of the University of Minnesota. The system office site is listed but not averaged, since it is not a campus homepage.
A 95
Average security score of 5 fully scanned University of Minnesota campus sites
2nd
of 57 systems, ranked by average security score
5 of 5
University of minnesota campus sites fully scanned
B 85
Average security score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How University of Minnesota security scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 5 fully scanned University of Minnesota campus sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 5 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- University of Minnesota average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 0 |
| 60 to 69 | 0 |
| 70 to 79 | 0 |
| 80 to 89 | 2 |
| 90 to 100 | 3 |
University of Minnesota by security grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. University of Minnesota: 5 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| University of Minnesota | 60% (3) | 40% (2) | 0% (0) |
| All education sites | 19% (505) | 79% (2,113) | 3% (69) |
Top 3 University of Minnesota campus sites by security score
#1 in University of Minnesota · U.S. education rank 1
University of Minnesota-Crookston
A 100 security
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability D
- Readability F
#1 in University of Minnesota · U.S. education rank 1
University of Minnesota-Morris
A 100 security
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability B
- Readability A
#1 in University of Minnesota · U.S. education rank 1
University of Minnesota-Rochester
A 100 security
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability D
- Readability F
What each check means
- Errors in the console. The page loads without JavaScript or network errors. Site may have hidden bugs that break features.
University of Minnesota campuses by security score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
crk.umn.edu
University of Minnesota-Crookston U.S. rank 1 |
8 of 8 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
morris.umn.edu
University of Minnesota-Morris U.S. rank 1 |
8 of 8 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
r.umn.edu
University of Minnesota-Rochester U.S. rank 1 |
8 of 8 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
d.umn.edu
University of Minnesota-Duluth U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
twin-cities.umn.edu
University of Minnesota-Twin Cities U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
About security
Secure your site and protect users with proper security practices.
Why it's important
Strong defenses prevent hackers from stealing personal information and other confidential data.
Risks
- Hackers can steal private information from your site.
Guidance
What we use to grade security:
- CISA Website Security
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- CISA Cybersecurity Performance Goals
- RFC 9116
- OWASP Top 10
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
Standards
- Content security policy (CSP)
- HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)
- security.txt
- X-Content-Type-Options
- Errors in the console
- Clickjacking mitigation
- Paste preventing inputs
- Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure (HTTPS)
- Sponsored top-level domain (sTLD)
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/1/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.