University of Minnesota: readability rankings

Readability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 5 University of Minnesota campus websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 5
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Campuses of the University of Minnesota. The system office site is listed but not averaged, since it is not a campus homepage.

F 40

Average readability score of 5 fully scanned University of Minnesota campus sites

25th

of 57 systems, ranked by average readability score

5 of 5

University of minnesota campus sites fully scanned

F 56

Average readability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How University of Minnesota readability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 5 fully scanned University of Minnesota campus sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 5 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • University of Minnesota average
  • All education average
View the data table
How University of Minnesota readability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 93
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 790
80 to 890
90 to 1002

University of Minnesota by readability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. University of Minnesota: 5 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. University of MinnesotaA (90 to 100): 40% (2 sites)D to F (below 70): 60% (3 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 53% (1,425 sites)D to F (below 70): 41% (1,110 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
University of Minnesota by readability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
University of Minnesota40% (2)0% (0)60% (3)
All education sites53% (1,425)0% (0)41% (1,110)

Top 3 University of Minnesota campus sites by readability score

#1 in University of Minnesota · U.S. education rank 1

University of Minnesota-Morris

A 100 readability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#1 in University of Minnesota · U.S. education rank 1

University of Minnesota-Twin Cities

A 100 readability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#2 in University of Minnesota · U.S. education rank 58

University of Minnesota-Crookston

F 0 readability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability D
  • Readability F

Most common readability failures among University of Minnesota campus sites

Share of the 5 fully scanned University of Minnesota campus sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Reading level60% (3 of 5 sites)
View the data table
Most common readability failures among University of Minnesota campus sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Reading level60%3

What each check means

  • Reading level. Page text reads at or below a 7th grade level so most users can understand it. Users struggle to understand your content.

Every education site with one problem

University of Minnesota campuses by readability score

University of Minnesota campuses ranked by readability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 morris.umn.edu
University of Minnesota-Morris U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 twin-cities.umn.edu
University of Minnesota-Twin Cities U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
2 crk.umn.edu
University of Minnesota-Crookston U.S. rank 58
0 of 1 checks pass F
2 d.umn.edu
University of Minnesota-Duluth U.S. rank 12
0 of 1 checks pass F
2 r.umn.edu
University of Minnesota-Rochester U.S. rank 56
0 of 1 checks pass F

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/1/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo