Southeastern Conference: usability rankings

Usability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 16 Southeastern Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 16
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Southeastern Conference (NCAA Division I), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

D 67

Average usability score of 16 fully scanned Southeastern Conference member sites

15th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score

16 of 16

Southeastern conference member sites fully scanned

D 68

Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Southeastern Conference usability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 16 fully scanned Southeastern Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 16 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Southeastern Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Southeastern Conference usability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 391
40 to 491
50 to 594
60 to 692
70 to 791
80 to 896
90 to 1001

Southeastern Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Southeastern Conference: 16 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Southeastern ConferenceA (90 to 100): 6% (1 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 44% (7 sites)D to F (below 70): 50% (8 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 11% (289 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 42% (1,124 sites)D to F (below 70): 47% (1,274 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Southeastern Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Southeastern Conference6% (1)44% (7)50% (8)
All education sites11% (289)42% (1,124)47% (1,274)

Top 3 Southeastern Conference member sites by usability score

#1 in Southeastern Conference · U.S. education rank 2

Vanderbilt University

A 93 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability B
  • Security C
  • Usability A
  • Readability F

#2 in Southeastern Conference · U.S. education rank 4

Auburn University

B 87 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

#2 in Southeastern Conference · U.S. education rank 4

University of South Carolina-Columbia

B 87 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability B
  • Security C
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

Most common usability failures among Southeastern Conference member sites

Share of the 16 fully scanned Southeastern Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Open Graph image alt81% (13 of 16 sites)
  2. First Contentful Paint (FCP)63% (10 of 16 sites)
  3. Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)63% (10 of 16 sites)
  4. Open Graph type56% (9 of 16 sites)
  5. Open Graph site name50% (8 of 16 sites)
View the data table
Most common usability failures among Southeastern Conference member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Open Graph image alt81%13
First Contentful Paint (FCP)63%10
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)63%10
Open Graph type56%9
Open Graph site name50%8

What each check means

  • Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
  • First Contentful Paint (FCP). The page starts displaying content within 1.8 seconds. Users see blank screen and think site is broken.
  • Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). The page's main content loads within 2.5 seconds. Users wait too long and leave your page.
  • Open Graph type. The page declares its content type for social media cards. Social media shows wrong content type.
  • Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.

Every education site with one problem

Southeastern Conference members by usability score

Southeastern Conference members ranked by usability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 vanderbilt.edu
Vanderbilt University U.S. rank 2
15 of 16 checks pass A
2 auburn.edu
Auburn University U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
2 sc.edu
University of South Carolina-Columbia U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
3 msstate.edu
Mississippi State University U.S. rank 10
12 of 15 checks pass B
3 utk.edu
The University of Tennessee-Knoxville U.S. rank 10
12 of 15 checks pass B
3 uark.edu
University of Arkansas U.S. rank 10
12 of 15 checks pass B
3 ou.edu
University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus U.S. rank 10
12 of 15 checks pass B
4 ufl.edu
University of Florida U.S. rank 14
11 of 15 checks pass C
5 ua.edu
The University of Alabama U.S. rank 18
10 of 15 checks pass D
6 tamu.edu
Texas A&M University-College Station U.S. rank 21
9 of 15 checks pass D
7 olemiss.edu
University of Mississippi U.S. rank 23
9 of 16 checks pass F
8 uky.edu
University of Kentucky U.S. rank 24
8 of 15 checks pass F
9 lsu.edu
Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College U.S. rank 25
8 of 16 checks pass F
9 missouri.edu
University of Missouri-Columbia U.S. rank 25
8 of 16 checks pass F
10 utexas.edu
The University of Texas at Austin U.S. rank 26
7 of 15 checks pass F
11 uga.edu
University of Georgia U.S. rank 34
5 of 16 checks pass F

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo