Showing Southeastern Conference member sites. All education sites
Members of the Southeastern Conference (NCAA Division I), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.
B 86
Average security score of 16 fully scanned Southeastern Conference member sites
8th
of 96 conferences, ranked by average security score
16 of 16
Southeastern conference member sites fully scanned
B 85
Average security score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How Southeastern Conference security scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 16 fully scanned Southeastern Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 16 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Southeastern Conference average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 0 |
| 60 to 69 | 0 |
| 70 to 79 | 4 |
| 80 to 89 | 10 |
| 90 to 100 | 2 |
Southeastern Conference by security grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Southeastern Conference: 16 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Southeastern Conference | 13% (2) | 88% (14) | 0% (0) |
| All education sites | 19% (505) | 79% (2,113) | 3% (69) |
Top 3 Southeastern Conference member sites by security score
#1 in Southeastern Conference · U.S. education rank 1
The University of Alabama
A 100 security
- Accessibility A
- Botability B
- Security A
- Usability D
- Readability F
#1 in Southeastern Conference · U.S. education rank 1
University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus
A 100 security
- Accessibility B
- Botability D
- Security A
- Usability B
- Readability F
#2 in Southeastern Conference · U.S. education rank 2
Texas A&M University-College Station
B 88 security
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability D
- Readability A
What each check means
- X-Content-Type-Options. The site tells browsers not to guess the type of files it serves. Browsers might run dangerous files by mistake.
- Errors in the console. The page loads without JavaScript or network errors. Site may have hidden bugs that break features.
- Security.txt. The site has a security.txt file so researchers know how to report issues. Security researchers cannot report problems to you.
Southeastern Conference members by security score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
ua.edu
The University of Alabama U.S. rank 1 |
8 of 8 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
ou.edu
University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus U.S. rank 1 |
8 of 8 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
tamu.edu
Texas A&M University-College Station U.S. rank 2 |
8 of 9 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
uga.edu
University of Georgia U.S. rank 2 |
8 of 9 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
auburn.edu
Auburn University U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
lsu.edu
Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
msstate.edu
Mississippi State University U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
utk.edu
The University of Tennessee-Knoxville U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
uark.edu
University of Arkansas U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
uky.edu
University of Kentucky U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
olemiss.edu
University of Mississippi U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
missouri.edu
University of Missouri-Columbia U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 4 |
sc.edu
University of South Carolina-Columbia U.S. rank 5 |
7 of 9 checks pass | C |
| 5 |
utexas.edu
The University of Texas at Austin U.S. rank 6 |
6 of 8 checks pass | C |
| 5 |
ufl.edu
University of Florida U.S. rank 6 |
6 of 8 checks pass | C |
| 5 |
vanderbilt.edu
Vanderbilt University U.S. rank 6 |
6 of 8 checks pass | C |
About security
Secure your site and protect users with proper security practices.
Why it's important
Strong defenses prevent hackers from stealing personal information and other confidential data.
Risks
- Hackers can steal private information from your site.
Guidance
What we use to grade security:
- CISA Website Security
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- CISA Cybersecurity Performance Goals
- RFC 9116
- OWASP Top 10
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
Standards
- Content security policy (CSP)
- HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)
- security.txt
- X-Content-Type-Options
- Errors in the console
- Clickjacking mitigation
- Paste preventing inputs
- Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure (HTTPS)
- Sponsored top-level domain (sTLD)
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.