South Atlantic Conference: usability rankings

Usability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 12 South Atlantic Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 12
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the South Atlantic Conference (NCAA Division II), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

C 71

Average usability score of 11 fully scanned South Atlantic Conference member sites

11th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score

11 of 12

South atlantic conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades

D 68

Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How South Atlantic Conference usability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 11 fully scanned South Atlantic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 11 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • South Atlantic Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How South Atlantic Conference usability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 592
60 to 693
70 to 792
80 to 894
90 to 1000

South Atlantic Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. South Atlantic Conference: 11 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. South Atlantic ConferenceB to C (70 to 89): 55% (6 sites)D to F (below 70): 45% (5 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 11% (289 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 42% (1,124 sites)D to F (below 70): 47% (1,274 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
South Atlantic Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
South Atlantic Conference0% (0)55% (6)45% (5)
All education sites11% (289)42% (1,124)47% (1,274)

Top 3 South Atlantic Conference member sites by usability score

#1 in South Atlantic Conference · U.S. education rank 4

Catawba College

B 87 usability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability B
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#2 in South Atlantic Conference · U.S. education rank 9

Anderson University

B 81 usability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

#2 in South Atlantic Conference · U.S. education rank 9

Carson-Newman University

B 81 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability B
  • Security C
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

Most common usability failures among South Atlantic Conference member sites

Share of the 11 fully scanned South Atlantic Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Open Graph image alt100% (11 of 11 sites)
  2. Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)64% (7 of 11 sites)
  3. Open Graph site name45% (5 of 11 sites)
  4. First Contentful Paint (FCP)36% (4 of 11 sites)
  5. Time to First Byte (TTFB)36% (4 of 11 sites)
View the data table
Most common usability failures among South Atlantic Conference member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Open Graph image alt100%11
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)64%7
Open Graph site name45%5
First Contentful Paint (FCP)36%4
Time to First Byte (TTFB)36%4

What each check means

  • Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
  • Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). The page's main content loads within 2.5 seconds. Users wait too long and leave your page.
  • Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
  • First Contentful Paint (FCP). The page starts displaying content within 1.8 seconds. Users see blank screen and think site is broken.
  • Time to First Byte (TTFB). The server sends the first byte of content within 0.8 seconds. Slow server delays everything on your page.

Every education site with one problem

South Atlantic Conference members by usability score

South Atlantic Conference members ranked by usability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 catawba.edu
Catawba College U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
2 andersonuniversity.edu
Anderson University U.S. rank 9
13 of 16 checks pass B
2 cn.edu
Carson-Newman University U.S. rank 9
13 of 16 checks pass B
2 newberry.edu
Newberry College U.S. rank 9
13 of 16 checks pass B
3 coker.edu
Coker University U.S. rank 13
12 of 16 checks pass C
3 emoryhenry.edu
Emory & Henry University U.S. rank 13
12 of 16 checks pass C
4 mhu.edu
Mars Hill University U.S. rank 17
11 of 16 checks pass D
5 uvawise.edu
University of Virginia's College at Wise U.S. rank 18
10 of 15 checks pass D
6 wingate.edu
Wingate University U.S. rank 20
10 of 16 checks pass D
7 lr.edu
Lenoir-Rhyne University U.S. rank 23
9 of 16 checks pass F
8 lmunet.edu
Lincoln Memorial University U.S. rank 25
8 of 16 checks pass F
tusculum.edu
Tusculum University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/28/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo