South Atlantic Conference: website rankings

Rankings, grades, and the most common failures for 12 South Atlantic Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 12
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the South Atlantic Conference (NCAA Division II), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 83

Average overall score of 11 fully scanned South Atlantic Conference member sites

9th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average overall score

11 of 12

South atlantic conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades

B 85

Average overall score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How South Atlantic Conference overall scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 11 fully scanned South Atlantic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 11 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • South Atlantic Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How South Atlantic Conference overall scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 793
80 to 897
90 to 1001

South Atlantic Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. South Atlantic Conference: 11 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. South Atlantic ConferenceA (90 to 100): 9% (1 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 91% (10 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 25% (659 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 73% (1,965 sites)D to F (below 70): 2% (63 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
South Atlantic Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
South Atlantic Conference9% (1)91% (10)0% (0)
All education sites25% (659)73% (1,965)2% (63)

South Atlantic Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites

Average of the 11 fully scanned South Atlantic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. The comparison covers 2687 fully scanned education sites.

  1. Accessibility88All education: 91
  2. Botability84All education: 89
  3. Security86All education: 85
  4. Usability71All education: 68
  5. Readability64All education: 56
  • South Atlantic Conference
  • All education
View the data table
South Atlantic Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites
IndicatorSouth Atlantic Conference averageAll education average
Accessibility8891
Botability8489
Security8685
Usability7168
Readability6456

Top 3 South Atlantic Conference member sites by overall score

#1 in South Atlantic Conference · U.S. education rank 7

Newberry College

A 94 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#2 in South Atlantic Conference · U.S. education rank 15

Anderson University

B 86 overall

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

#2 in South Atlantic Conference · U.S. education rank 15

Carson-Newman University

B 86 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability B
  • Security C
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

Most common failures by indicator

The check South Atlantic Conference member sites fail most often in each indicator. Each indicator page lists the top five.

South Atlantic Conference members by overall score

South Atlantic Conference members ranked by overall score
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
1 newberry.edu
Newberry College U.S. rank 7
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
2 andersonuniversity.edu
Anderson University U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
2 cn.edu
Carson-Newman University U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
3 lr.edu
Lenoir-Rhyne University U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
3 wingate.edu
Wingate University U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
4 catawba.edu
Catawba College U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
5 coker.edu
Coker University U.S. rank 19
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
B
6 uvawise.edu
University of Virginia's College at Wise U.S. rank 21
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
7 emoryhenry.edu
Emory & Henry University U.S. rank 22
  • Accessibility grade C
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
C
8 lmunet.edu
Lincoln Memorial University U.S. rank 23
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
9 mhu.edu
Mars Hill University U.S. rank 28
  • Accessibility grade C
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
C
tusculum.edu
Tusculum University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/28/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo