Old Dominion Athletic Conf.: website rankings

Rankings, grades, and the most common failures for 11 Old Dominion Athletic Conf. member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 11
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Old Dominion Athletic Conf. (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 87

Average overall score of 10 fully scanned Old Dominion Athletic Conf. member sites

5th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average overall score

10 of 11

Old dominion athletic conf. member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades

B 85

Average overall score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Old Dominion Athletic Conf. overall scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 10 fully scanned Old Dominion Athletic Conf. member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 10 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Old Dominion Athletic Conf. average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Old Dominion Athletic Conf. overall scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 791
80 to 895
90 to 1004

Old Dominion Athletic Conf. by overall grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Old Dominion Athletic Conf.: 10 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Old Dominion Athletic Conf.A (90 to 100): 40% (4 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 60% (6 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 25% (659 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 73% (1,965 sites)D to F (below 70): 2% (63 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Old Dominion Athletic Conf. by overall grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Old Dominion Athletic Conf.40% (4)60% (6)0% (0)
All education sites25% (659)73% (1,965)2% (63)

Old Dominion Athletic Conf. average score by indicator, compared with all education sites

Average of the 10 fully scanned Old Dominion Athletic Conf. member sites, score 0 to 100. The comparison covers 2687 fully scanned education sites.

  1. Accessibility91All education: 91
  2. Botability93All education: 89
  3. Security81All education: 85
  4. Usability76All education: 68
  5. Readability80All education: 56
  • Old Dominion Athletic Conf.
  • All education
View the data table
Old Dominion Athletic Conf. average score by indicator, compared with all education sites
IndicatorOld Dominion Athletic Conf. averageAll education average
Accessibility9191
Botability9389
Security8185
Usability7668
Readability8056

Top 3 Old Dominion Athletic Conf. member sites by overall score

#1 in Old Dominion Athletic Conf. · U.S. education rank 6

Randolph-Macon College

A 95 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability F

#2 in Old Dominion Athletic Conf. · U.S. education rank 10

Guilford College

A 91 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability C
  • Readability A

#2 in Old Dominion Athletic Conf. · U.S. education rank 10

Hampden-Sydney College

A 91 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

Most common failures by indicator

The check Old Dominion Athletic Conf. member sites fail most often in each indicator. Each indicator page lists the top five.

Old Dominion Athletic Conf. members by overall score

Old Dominion Athletic Conf. members ranked by overall score
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
1 rmc.edu
Randolph-Macon College U.S. rank 6
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
2 guilford.edu
Guilford College U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
A
2 hsc.edu
Hampden-Sydney College U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
3 su.edu
Shenandoah University U.S. rank 11
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
4 roanoke.edu
Roanoke College U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
4 lynchburg.edu
University of Lynchburg U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
B
5 sbc.edu
Sweet Briar College U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
6 averett.edu
Averett University U.S. rank 19
  • Accessibility grade C
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
6 bridgewater.edu
Bridgewater College U.S. rank 19
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
7 emu.edu
Eastern Mennonite University U.S. rank 24
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
randolphcollege.edu
Randolph College
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo