Ohio Valley Conference websites ranked by digital experience

Rankings, grades, and the most common failures for 9 Ohio Valley Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 9
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Ohio Valley Conference (NCAA Division I), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 83

Average overall score of 8 fully scanned Ohio Valley Conference member sites

9th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average overall score

8 of 9

Ohio valley conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades

B 85

Average overall score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Ohio Valley Conference overall scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 8 fully scanned Ohio Valley Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 8 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Ohio Valley Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Ohio Valley Conference overall scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 792
80 to 895
90 to 1001

Ohio Valley Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Ohio Valley Conference: 8 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Ohio Valley ConferenceA (90 to 100): 13% (1 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 88% (7 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 25% (659 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 73% (1,965 sites)D to F (below 70): 2% (63 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Ohio Valley Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Ohio Valley Conference13% (1)88% (7)0% (0)
All education sites25% (659)73% (1,965)2% (63)

Ohio Valley Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites

Average of the 8 fully scanned Ohio Valley Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. The comparison covers 2687 fully scanned education sites.

  1. Accessibility92All education: 91
  2. Botability92All education: 89
  3. Security89All education: 85
  4. Usability56All education: 68
  5. Readability63All education: 56
  • Ohio Valley Conference
  • All education
View the data table
Ohio Valley Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites
IndicatorOhio Valley Conference averageAll education average
Accessibility9291
Botability9289
Security8985
Usability5668
Readability6356

Top 3 Ohio Valley Conference member sites by overall score

#1 in Ohio Valley Conference · U.S. education rank 9

Lindenwood University

A 92 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability A
  • Readability F

#2 in Ohio Valley Conference · U.S. education rank 12

Southeast Missouri State University

B 89 overall

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability C
  • Readability A

#3 in Ohio Valley Conference · U.S. education rank 17

Morehead State University

B 84 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability B
  • Security B
  • Usability C
  • Readability F

Most common failures by indicator

The check Ohio Valley Conference member sites fail most often in each indicator. Each indicator page lists the top five.

Ohio Valley Conference members by overall score

Ohio Valley Conference members ranked by overall score
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
1 lindenwood.edu
Lindenwood University U.S. rank 9
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
2 semo.edu
Southeast Missouri State University U.S. rank 12
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
B
3 moreheadstate.edu
Morehead State University U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
B
3 utm.edu
The University of Tennessee-Martin U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
B
3 usi.edu
University of Southern Indiana U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
4 eiu.edu
Eastern Illinois University U.S. rank 19
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
5 siue.edu
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville U.S. rank 26
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
5 wiu.edu
Western Illinois University U.S. rank 26
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
tnstate.edu
Tennessee State University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/25/2026 and 11/7/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo