New England Small College Athletic Conference: website rankings

Rankings, grades, and the most common failures for 9 New England Small College Athletic Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 9
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the New England Small College Athletic Conference (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 89

Average overall score of 8 fully scanned New England Small College Athletic Conference member sites

3rd

of 96 conferences, ranked by average overall score

8 of 9

New england small college athletic conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades

B 85

Average overall score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How New England Small College Athletic Conference overall scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 8 fully scanned New England Small College Athletic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 8 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • New England Small College Athletic Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How New England Small College Athletic Conference overall scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 790
80 to 895
90 to 1003

New England Small College Athletic Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. New England Small College Athletic Conference: 8 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. New England Small College Athletic ConferenceA (90 to 100): 38% (3 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 63% (5 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 25% (659 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 73% (1,965 sites)D to F (below 70): 2% (63 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
New England Small College Athletic Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
New England Small College Athletic Conference38% (3)63% (5)0% (0)
All education sites25% (659)73% (1,965)2% (63)

New England Small College Athletic Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites

Average of the 8 fully scanned New England Small College Athletic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. The comparison covers 2687 fully scanned education sites.

  1. Accessibility93All education: 91
  2. Botability88All education: 89
  3. Security81All education: 85
  4. Usability86All education: 68
  5. Readability38All education: 56
  • New England Small College Athletic Conference
  • All education
View the data table
New England Small College Athletic Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites
IndicatorNew England Small College Athletic Conference averageAll education average
Accessibility9391
Botability8889
Security8185
Usability8668
Readability3856

Top 3 New England Small College Athletic Conference member sites by overall score

#1 in New England Small College Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 5

Hamilton College

A 96 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#2 in New England Small College Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 7

Bates College

A 94 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability F

#3 in New England Small College Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 10

Tufts University

A 91 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

Most common failures by indicator

The check New England Small College Athletic Conference member sites fail most often in each indicator. Each indicator page lists the top five.

New England Small College Athletic Conference members by overall score

New England Small College Athletic Conference members ranked by overall score
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
1 hamilton.edu
Hamilton College U.S. rank 5
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
2 bates.edu
Bates College U.S. rank 7
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
3 tufts.edu
Tufts University U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
4 trincoll.edu
Trinity College U.S. rank 12
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
B
5 bowdoin.edu
Bowdoin College U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
B
6 wesleyan.edu
Wesleyan University U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
B
7 conncoll.edu
Connecticut College U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
B
8 middlebury.edu
Middlebury College U.S. rank 18
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
williams.edu
Williams College
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo