New England Small College Athletic Conference: usability rankings

Usability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 9 New England Small College Athletic Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 9
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the New England Small College Athletic Conference (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 86

Average usability score of 8 fully scanned New England Small College Athletic Conference member sites

2nd

of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score

8 of 9

New england small college athletic conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades

D 68

Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How New England Small College Athletic Conference usability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 8 fully scanned New England Small College Athletic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 8 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • New England Small College Athletic Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How New England Small College Athletic Conference usability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 591
60 to 690
70 to 791
80 to 891
90 to 1005

New England Small College Athletic Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. New England Small College Athletic Conference: 8 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. New England Small College Athletic ConferenceA (90 to 100): 63% (5 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 25% (2 sites)D to F (below 70): 13% (1 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 11% (289 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 42% (1,124 sites)D to F (below 70): 47% (1,274 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
New England Small College Athletic Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
New England Small College Athletic Conference63% (5)25% (2)13% (1)
All education sites11% (289)42% (1,124)47% (1,274)

Top 3 New England Small College Athletic Conference member sites by usability score

#1 in New England Small College Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Bowdoin College

A 100 usability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability C
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability F

#2 in New England Small College Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 2

Bates College

A 93 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability F

#2 in New England Small College Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 2

Connecticut College

A 93 usability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability A
  • Readability F

Most common usability failures among New England Small College Athletic Conference member sites

Share of the 8 fully scanned New England Small College Athletic Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Open Graph image alt63% (5 of 8 sites)
  2. Time to First Byte (TTFB)25% (2 of 8 sites)
  3. Open Graph description25% (2 of 8 sites)
  4. First Contentful Paint (FCP)13% (1 of 8 sites)
  5. Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)13% (1 of 8 sites)
View the data table
Most common usability failures among New England Small College Athletic Conference member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Open Graph image alt63%5
Time to First Byte (TTFB)25%2
Open Graph description25%2
First Contentful Paint (FCP)13%1
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)13%1

What each check means

  • Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
  • Time to First Byte (TTFB). The server sends the first byte of content within 0.8 seconds. Slow server delays everything on your page.
  • Open Graph description. The page has a description for social media previews. Shared links have no description on social media.
  • First Contentful Paint (FCP). The page starts displaying content within 1.8 seconds. Users see blank screen and think site is broken.
  • Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). The page's main content loads within 2.5 seconds. Users wait too long and leave your page.

Every education site with one problem

New England Small College Athletic Conference members by usability score

New England Small College Athletic Conference members ranked by usability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 bowdoin.edu
Bowdoin College U.S. rank 1
16 of 16 checks pass A
2 bates.edu
Bates College U.S. rank 2
15 of 16 checks pass A
2 conncoll.edu
Connecticut College U.S. rank 2
14 of 15 checks pass A
2 hamilton.edu
Hamilton College U.S. rank 2
15 of 16 checks pass A
2 trincoll.edu
Trinity College U.S. rank 2
15 of 16 checks pass A
3 tufts.edu
Tufts University U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
4 wesleyan.edu
Wesleyan University U.S. rank 13
12 of 16 checks pass C
5 middlebury.edu
Middlebury College U.S. rank 23
9 of 16 checks pass F
williams.edu
Williams College
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo